You may have read the story in da local Snoozepaper, but one thing is definitely for certain - da 2-year long Manalapan vs. Moskovitz "Land-deal-gone-bad-First Amendment" lawsuit will not be ending. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know this for certain. All you have to do to know for sure --- is to read da Snoozer story for yourself - - and read between da lines.
"According to Township Attorney Ron Cucchiaro, who explained the matter during the committee meeting, Moskovitz will be asked to sign off on the stipulation of agreement. If he does so, the case ends. If he does not, the case will continue."
REASON #1: In order to have a lawsuit - you need a lawyer - and Manalapan Township has NONE! DaTruthSquad previously let you know that Manalapan contingency fee attorney David Weeks wanted out of da case after two years and no end in sight. Apparently this was such a strong, no-chance-of-losing, slam dunk, can't-miss, easy victory case, that after a nearly 4 month search, Manalapan Township was unable to even find one attorney in da whole United States that would take this case!
"Mayor Richard Klauber said at the committee's June 24 meeting that the $100,000 figure includes the engineering fees, testing and the cleanup of the contaminated property. He said the township has spent $7,000 on the legal case."
REASON #2: Da money spent on da case doesn't add up. Without a lawyer handling da case, it can easily be surmised that current Manalapan Township attorney Ron Cucchiaro must be da point man for this lawsuit - and since he's on da town payroll, is he handling this case pro bono? Also from da "Hey, I'll work for free department," Manalapan refuses to discuss how much money was spent during da "First Amendment" portion of this case, which included more than one 50+ page legal brief and other briefs and court appearances which da politicians apparently want people to believe was out of da goodness of their hearts?
"We learned that he doesn’t have malpractice insurance and I don’t know if we could ever collect a judgment from him personally,” Klauber said."
REASON #3: Manalapan Township knew shortly after their lawsuit against Moskovitz started, he decided not to include his insurance carrier in da case. Why did he not include da insurance carrier? One can surmise he did not include the insurance carrier because tere was no need to have them involved in what was considered a frivolous case -- One has to wonder whether former Manalapan Township Attorney Don Lomurra, who was the attorney for Manalapan when da judge ordered da Dreyer Patch sale, informed his insurance carrier too?
"Mayor Richard Klauber said at the committee's June 24 meeting that the $100,000 figure includes the engineering fees, testing and the cleanup of the contaminated property. He said the township has spent $7,000 on the legal case."
REASON #4: If da Commissar is correct, then we can only surmise that da lawyer Moskovitz, who allegedly sent kids to Ivy League schools and has a big home, can't afford bus fare from Manalapan to Marlboro. His house isn't worth $100,000? His law office and legal practice isn't worth that? If all this is true, then I'm sure da Brooklyn Bridge is Manalapan's next big purchase.
"Klauber said. “It is now in the best interests of the township to not go forward.”
REASON #5: Da Commissar's statement isn't that bad, but please substitute "Klauber & Roth" for da word "township." Da very last thing "Candidate for Township" Klauber & "Candidate for State Assembly" Roth want is to have this 50,000 pound albatross hanging over their heads -- and da possibility they too could potentially become "defendants" in this case. And, FYI - daTruthSquad has learned, despite an apparent media blackout in this case by da Manalapan Township Committee, that current Committeeman Andy Boy Lucas isn't da only 3rd party DEFENDANT in da Mosked Man case. Da fear is more will be named, and da alleged media blackout wouldn't be able to hold.
And, maybe da lynchpin reason this case will continue, Queen Candidate & Manalapan Township Committee Judge, Jury & Executioner Michelle Roth's "take foot and jackhammer it into da mouth" statement - "This was always a case of malpractice committed by Stuart Moskovitz. He failed to include proper safeguards for environmental contingencies in the purchase contract of the Herbert and Dreyer houses."
REASON #6: A representative of Manalapan comes out and says "this was always a case of malpractice committed by Stuart Moskovitz." If you're da Mosked Man, are you going to let this go without a response?
So, let's recap before we go forward.
Manalapan reportedly has no lawyer for a case that was to them as obvious easily winable as da receding hairline of Andy Boy. Manalapan wants to end da case, not because they know they can win, but because they fear da Mosked man to them must already be a frequent visitor to soup kitchens and a resident of a homeless shelter.
Now, da Mosked Man's side. Moskovitz told Snoozer report Mark Rosman, "statements by the Township Committee on June 24 regarding this case were offensive and inaccurate in every detail, as have been most statements by township representatives regarding this matter since its inception."
If this is statement by da Mosked Man is accurate, then members of da Manalapan Township Committee, it must be surmised, have not been truthful with da residents of Manalapan. Why would Manalapan be willing to drop da case and not recoup a dime after two years?
Now, for daTruth - #1: There seems to be a serious credibility issue for Manalapan.
DaTruth is, this case went too far beyond da point of no return. When da Manalapan Legal Dream Team decided that they would take da First Amendment and grind it under da tires of a Dream Teamer's SUV, they were embarassed in court by daTruthSquad's legal experts, an embarassment that would become da centerpiece for this whole case. Everybody knows when you lack credibility, your case is in serious jeopardy.
Now, for daTruth - #2: What is happening in court isn't being told to Manalapan residents paying for da case.
DaTruth is, Manalapan apparently was told to replace their contingency fee lawyer, and after 4 months, found no takers. That news apparently never reached Manalapan residents. Current Mayor Commissar Klauber says da taxpayers have only paid $7,000 on this case. If that is accurate, then why did da engineer get paid a reported $65,000 for an engineering study for a $10,500 cleanup? Even da now-famous "Rosman Editorial," which became a part of da Mosked Man legal case, admits da "Money Spent on Lawyers" issue had serious questions attached to it. What did former Township Attorney Carolina MachoGrande bill? What was paid to Union County attorneys in this case? Since manalapan refuses to come clean and itemize all of da legal billing in this case, taxpayers forced to pay da bill may never know.
Now, for daTruth - #3: One word - ELECTIONS!
Currently, Manalapan Mayor Commissar Klauber is running for reelection in Manalapan. Da last thing he, and Manalapan Committeewoman & current State Assembly candidate Michelle Roth need is for da discovery phase of this lawsuit, where da Mosked Man can ask for any and all information he desires, which includes potentially Executive Session discussions, and potentially other information about their tenure in Town Hall they may not want people to know about.
Now, for da question you want to know -- will this case continue?
Da answer --- ABSOLUTELY YES. DaTruth is, there's no reason why da Mosked Man would want this to go away right now. He's holding all da cards. He's added Andy Boy and at least two other current or former Manalapan professionals to this lawsuit. Discovery could allow that list of DEFENDANTS to increase, and could possibly include current or former Manalapan politicians - another reason Manalapan politicians would want this to go away, and a reason da Mosked Man would want this to continue.
Why would da Mosked Man want to sign a "stipulation of agreement" if he did nothing wrong? Would you, if your name and reputation were dragged through da mud for two years?
And, after da Queen's bombshell in da Snoozepaper that da Mosked Man was basically guilty, will he drop this case?
Here's daTruthSquad's take:
1. Da Mosked Man, according to sources, has another meeting with da judge in da case in July. At that time, he will either ask da judge toss da case with cause (that it was indeed frivolous and Manalapan has no case), or he will demand da case move forward and enter da discovery phase.
2. Da Mosked Man, if this moves forward, could potentially add others to da case, which may include current members of da Manalapan Township Committee, former members, or other professionals tied into da events of da case -- a potentially embarrassing situation for da Queen & da Commissar.
3. It would be ridiculous for da Mosked Man to drop da case, because he has already attached 3rd party DEFENDANTS to it, and that could only help his case.
4. He has obviously put in hundreds and even thousands of billable hours into this case, and should be reimbursed for his time by da plaintiff -- YOU DA TAXPAYERS OF MANALAPAN. That bill could easily be 6-figures of taxpayer money if it happens.
5. If you're da Mosked Man, do you let da Queen off da hook for her "guilty" statement?
DaTruth is, this case will most likely continue, and it could get both ugly and embarrassing for Manalapan politicians, so sit back and watch da events unfurl.
Speaking of lawsuits, daTruthSquad will soon discuss another celebrated lawsuit that tries to set fire to da First Amendment. Da shocking events of that case will be detailed soon.
And that's datruth.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
57 comments:
Nice to have the blog back to the way it was. Freedom of Speech and no spam comments.
It's obvious to me that if the town is backing down from this fight, then they know they can't win. Two years of this shows Moskovitz was right and this whole thing was nothing more than a political vendetta.
Personally I don't even like Moskovitz, and I expected him to lose this case because of what I read in the newspaper. Now that the town is caving in and wants to drop it, there's no doubt in my mind its like you say and its because they're running for office and don't want this case over their heads.
If I were treated by the TC the way they treated Moskovitz, I'd sue the town for every penny.
Apparently you didn't read the TRanscript. They clearly said they don't know if they would ever get any money out of Malpractice Moskovitz. They're smart to stop this now, because it would only drain taxpayers if he can't pay.
Maybe before you write this foolish little blog, you should read the facts first. Obviously you won't print this because being the Fascist you are you don't respect other opinions.
^ I agree. Moskovitz would delay this forever, costing the town more money. It's not worth it. The town made the right move. For all the people who said the TC was costing the town money, in the end it would have been Moskovitz draining our tax dollars.
The last poster may be the only person in Manalapan dumb enough to believe they don't think Moskovitz can pay. First of all, anyone who believes ANYTHING coming from the mouth of Roth or Klauber is not the swiftest yacht in the harbor. The entire cleanup was $10,000. Period. That's it. Do you really believe ANYONE living in Manalapan can't pay that, let alone a homeowner with no mortgage? How idiotic can you get? Plus, as datruthsquad points out, Moskovitz made it clear ONE MONTH into the case TWO YEARS AGO that he was not giving it to his insurance carrier because it was frivolous. Just like Lomurro, Piechta and McCarthy when they were brought into the case, didn't give it to their insurance carriers. So let's not pretend that has ANYTHING to do with why they are trying to settle the case now.
I also have to give credit here to the Manalapan Township Committee for wanting to drop the case. If it does continue, obviously there would be much more money spent on it than has been already. Kudos to Michelle Roth and Richard Klauber for thinking of the taxpayers.
Michelle Roth and Richard Klauber are heroes to the taxpayers. They know the defendant Moskovitz can't pay the money. They did the right thing and I for one am proud of them. I'm sure this post will be deleted by the Fraud Squad's anti-American, anti-First Amendment screener because it doesn't paint his master in a good light.
You're absolutely right. It's a shame the Squad won't print Roth's press releases and outright lies. It's a shame they won't print the garbage the Transcript did when Miss Brillo was the propogandist covering Manalapan. This is where people find out what these politicians are really doing, and why I don't botherreading the Transcript anymore. Keep up the good work Squad.
Thanks Michelle. No one else is going to buy that nonsense, so it obviously is you posting. If Manalapan wanted to drop the case, they don't need Stu's approval. Also, since they knew two years ago that he wasn't giving this to his insurance carrier, that's a pretty lame excuse. None of what you said makes sense Michelle. If you wanted to save the taxpayer's money, you shouldn't have brought this case two years ago or at least should have dropped it once it was clear there was going to be no insurance company. Let's face it, Michelle, you are scrambling to end this case and put the best spin on it because your attorney walked away knowing the case is frivolous and no attorney -- other than maybe Fred Stone -- would be dumb enough to pick it up. There's an idea, Michelle. Why don't you guys hire Fred Stone? He's not busy right now. Isn't this also about the fact that on July 17, the summary judgment motion is going to be granted and you're going to be thrown out anyway?
Has everyone noticed that Fred (the only person making negative posts here, because everyone else is working for a living) never once said anything to show that what datruthsquad stated is incorrect. He never does. Fred posts hundreds of times a day and, do you realize, he has never provided any factual information, any intelligent debate, anything of value in any of those posts? That is truly amazing.
Actually, I think Fred Stone is the only one who posts what's true. After all, unlike the commenter’s on this blog, Fred is not ashamed to post his name. It's unfortunate for him that the town has a few vicious, childish people who write about him his family and anyone else on their hit list.
In fact, I think Fred is a township hero.
here's a shock for you. Fred Stone agrees with Stu on the issue of this silly lawsuit.
I'm glad you think you're a hero, Fred. The rest of us don't believe that a mutual fund scam artist who conned people out of millions of dollars (how much was the total con if just the FINE was $180,000,000, Fred?) is a "hero." Maybe to Michael Milkin and Bernie Madoff, but to the rest of us, you're a two bit thief with nothing to do all day but prove what a disgusting person you are by attacking good and decent people.
Interesting how the spamming of this blog started happening just before the insane announcement that Roth and Klauber decided that fearing Stu Moskovitz didn't have $10,000 to his name (despite his big home and profitable law practice), they would take pity and stop the taxpayer funded lawsuit against him.
Interesting how they make this insane announcement before a July 17 court hearing that will most likely clear Moskovitz and prove once and for all this was a political vendetta lawsuit.
If this doesn't cry out for a state investigation of Manalapan Town Hall, nothing does.
Squad, if you do an OPRA search, you'll find that the TC has spent over $30,000 in legal fees that can be documented so far on this lawsuit against Stu -- not the $7,000 claimed and on the record by Klauber. This means either Klauber is not telling the truth, or facts about the case are being hidden from him by someone.
I wonder who that could be?
"I'm glad you think you're a hero, Fred."
Maybe if you stopped your obnoxious guesses as to who is posting, people wouldn't hate your guts as universally as they do now.
"Fred is not ashamed to post his name"
And the hundreds of other posts using pseudonyms??????
actually, "fred" is a pseudonym. all the aothers are his real names.
Nice to see the spam gone. I was getting tired of certain village idiots calling each other pedophile.
Anyway, thanks for discussing this case. Due to the unprecedented blackout of any information coming from town hall, this is the only site available for ral information about this lawsuit. It's obvious to me now that it was nothing more than a political vendetta. The purportayers of this crime are Klauber and Roth, and they should be investigated by the state for this entire mess. I for one will be calling Anne Milgram's office.
So much for the First Amendment. Now we can't post anything without Comrad Datruthsquad's approval.
Here's what I find most interesting about this lawsuit. The town brings it against Moskovitz. They claim he's 100% responsible for everything.
There's no mention by the town that the engineer missed the problems to begin with, and so did the 2004 township attorney.
Then they sue a blog claiming its the blog's fault.
Now they want to drop the case, but they can't because they first must get approval to drop the case from the very person they are dragging through the mud.
If they had a slam dunk case, then why do they need Moskovitz's approval?
I think "da truth" is not being told to us. I think Moskovitz has already proved this was a sham case, and they need him to back down from the 3rd party claims he's made against Lucas, the engineer, the 2004 TC attorney, and the others. If I were Moskovitz, I'd say full steam ahead, use discovery to get all the information against Klauber and Roth that he can find, and sue them too.
Thanks DTS for keeping everyone informed, something the TC won't do.
I still want to know about Spodak's lawsuit against the Truth Squad. Since they are still blogging, my guess is that was another political vendetta lawsuit to nowhere - much like the Lynch-connected land deal and Roth stopping the Village to protect her political connection's land deal.
Actually, I believe Roth. It's quite possible Moskovitz has no money. His law firm can't be doing any business. I for one wouldn't hire him with a malpractice suit over his head. Obviously the town wouldn't have sued him if he weren't guilty.
if Moskovitz isn't doing any business, why is he working seven days a week? No one cares about the malpractice suit because there's no one still dumb enough to think it's legitimate. We're also talking about a 10,000 maximum judgment. Hell, he makes more than that in a month just off Shapiro.
"Obviously the town wouldn't have sued him if he weren't guilty."
LOL. That may be the funniest statement ever posted. Only Fred would be that clueless to claim every lawsuit ever filed against anyone is legitimate. Well, look at it this way. Obviously, Fred broke the law with his mutual fund scam, or they wouldn't have brought charges against him, right?
"Obviously the town wouldn't have sued him if he weren't guilty."
Obviously not the brightest bulb in the chandelier.
It's a close contest which is more moribund, Spodak or his suit.
If I were Stu, I wouldn't wake up a sleeping dog. Whenever Stu decides to initiate a dialog with Fred, Fred leaves him bloodied and begging for mercy.
Wasn't it about a year ago when Spodak brought that crazy lawsuit against the DTS? I hope he's spending his own money on it, so he can learn he cannot screw around wih the First Amendment. My guess is he probably didn't even want to do this, but was told to by Roth, IMHO. DTS< when are you going to give us an update on Spodak's folly???
"Fred leaves him bloodied and begging for mercy."
Fred, you're a legend in your own mind. How exactly have you left Stu "bloody?" So far, you've been fighting this battle all by yourself, day and night. Stu hasn't even participated and you've been bloodied. You've never come forward with anything credible in any of your attacks on Stu. You just sit there with nothing to do claiming Stu is posting, which is laughable to all of us, while people are posting every detail of your life in response that you had hoped would be kept private. Actually, it's almost as funny as Ayatollah Roth, who dresses like she gets her clothing from the Lane Bryant division of Goodwill and Richard Klauber whose suits still have the $99.00 special tag on them from Syms saying they thing the best dressed mayor we've had in thirty years may be unable to pay a $10,000 judgment. It's unbelievable how out of touch you're little group of corrupt politicians really is.
I think this blog being spam-free now is tremendous. Thanks Squad for putting an end to the childish, immature lackeys who take their marching orders from those Manalapan politicians hell-bent on ridding freedom of speech - unless it is their own.
Keep fighting the good fight for all the people Squad! I for one will keep reading.
Here's my question. We all know that Larry Roth can't afford to provide health care coverage for his family, causing Michelle to insist that the taxpayers pay for her health insurance while the other township committee people recognized that it wasn't fair to the taxpayers. So if Stu is in a thriving business where at the very least, he doesn't have to come to the taxpayers hat in hand begging for health insurance like Michelle Roth, where does she get off making ridiculous statements about Stu's financial status?
I agree with the poster above. Not letting Stu directed vicious attacks get through has definitley changed the tone of the comments section. Thanks squad,!
I read the Transcript story about the lawsuit, and as much as some Truth Squad haters probably would not want to admit, the TSquad is either on the right track, or very much on it. The Transcript said the town has paid much more than the $7000 Mayor Klauber claims is the top total. There was a $10,000 bill from one of the Moskovitz case lawyers. They're paying for Andy's lawyer, probably Valesi's too, the "expert," and also billing for Weeks, who BTW, isn't even handling the case, one of his subordinates is. If you need proof there, Len Garza from Weeks firm comes up on a lot of paperwork found on the EFF website.
Obvously either Klauber has to retract his statements, or he may very well be lying about this township business, and if that is the case, that is worthy of a state investigation into corruption IMHO.
Great reading from another site - before the anti-Truth Roth Squad deletes it.
4332.1. Read the News Transcript article
by 81alim, 6/29/09 11:04 ET
Re: Will the person by August9th, 6/29/09
a little over a year ago where the editor pointed out it exceeded $12,000 THEN. Since then, they've paid $10,000 to the Gebhardt firm and have also paid "disbursements" to the contingent fee attorney, not to mention the money they've paid to the "expert" who didn't even bother to include any mention of the 2004 Court Order Stu had to follow as Township Attorney when the "expert" wrote his "affidavit of merit."
After reading the Transcript story, and the inside information found on this blog, I too agree an investigation into Town Hall is definitely needed. It is obvious thatwhat is being told to us by the elected officials and town managers isn't reality. The fact Moskovitz sued town officials shows that. I have lost confidence in Roth and Klauber. Maybe Don Holland should take over the leadership.
sure sounds like don knotts is the "cabal member" who is leaking to stu. that little kiss DTS sent him will be the end of his worthless career in town democratic politics.
Sounds like another angry threat from the little vermin who make up the Manalapan Democratic Party. For ten years, they have attempted to destroy anyone who disagrees with their evil, vulgar and corrupt ways. I think they're going to find out that trying to attack Don is a little like trying to attack Stu. It's going to backfire on you big time. Ask the following how happy they are that they went after Stu: Jim Gray, Mary Cozzolino, Drew Shapiro, Andrew Lucas, Steve McEnery, Kathy Baratta. It didn't really work out that well for any of them, did it?
It would not surprise me one bit if Don Holland were not liked by Roth and Klauber. He has integrity, he's popular, he does what is right by the people, he thinks about the town first, and he can't be bought.
He's everything his cadre friends aren't. My guess is Don Holland is the next Gennaro for Roth.
I rad somewhere that Don Holland was at the last court hearing for Moskovitz. I believe after seeing first hand what a comical farse this lawsuit is, he was probably the one who went to Roth and said he will no longer support it.
It wouldn't surprise me if they try to censure Don Holland the next time something doesn't go their way.
Ask about Big George and the case about the Pine Brook School classroom and Murphy.
I'm guessing that someone whispered to Don Knotts that if he plays his cards right, he will be Mayor in a bi-partisan majority of Knotts, Cohen and Green.
OK - I'm asking.
What about Big George and the case about the Pine Brook School classroom and Murphy?
Who's Murphy? Why did he sue the Pine Brook School? Did he sue the school? Why would he?
You brought it up. Explain please.
Big George does not believe in freedom of speech, at least since the time he was mayor. He did not like what a teacher, Joe Murphy, said about Big George's John Lindsay-like snow collection. Big George sued and got his butt kicked out of court. Murphy went on to become an important figure in the NJEA>
You mean one of the big shots who helped make the NJEA one of the most expensive items on the taxpayer's bill? That gave the teachers their unbelievable sense of entitlement?
Why don't you just bend over and ask,
"please sir, may I have another?"
which doesn't alter the fact that George is a big blow hard that is responsible for more worthless suits than Robert Hall. Might I remind you that he was the one urging the Township to sue Stu.
I too am very curious. I remember last year when Brillo Barrattaa broke the news (I wonder how she got the exclusive story) about Spodak's lawsuit against the blogging world. Since then, not even a sound of crickets. Why? Where's the lawsuit Kathy? Was it all a lie? It can't take a year to file a lawsuit, can it? I'm starting to agree with one of the previous comments that said maybe Roth told him to do it, and he was just following orders. I'd also like to know who's financing this alleged lawsuit. Is it Roth or Spodak, or someone else?
Sounds like you are nervous. You should be...
Great post on NJ.com, before it gets deleted by the anti-First Amendment Roth Squad.....
4332.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. If you really want the truth
by 81alim, 6/30/09 12:35 ET
Re: Will the person by August9th, 6/30/09
why not OPRA the legal bills yourself? OPRA the bills for David Weeks, Daniel McCarthy, Caroline Casagrande, Kevin Kennedy, Steven Farsiou, Robert Renaud and Ron Cucchiaro. Those are the attorneys the township has paid to go after Stu on this case, all, of course, failing. And don't fall for the "David Weeks is on a contingent fee basis" nonsense. He still has been getting paid "disbursements." Don't you just love that one? In all, they have paid out more than $30,000 in legal fees while claiming to have spent only $7,000.00. Several people have this information already, so you're entitled to it if you ask the Township for it.
If you want the lies to be taken back, start with the following:
1. Stu was negligent.2. Stu can't afford to pay a judgment (this from the person who is soaking the taxpayers for health insurance because she can't afford to buy her own3. The Township only spent $7,000 on this case.4. There are $100,000 in engineering costs for a $10,000 cleanup.
"Sounds like you are nervous. You should be..."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
I'll say this for you Kathy. You always were good for a laugh.
Roth is hidding information from the public about this case. So is Klauber.
The truth will prevail and those two will have a lot of explaining to do.
Sooner than they even think.
One has had a successful and respected leader of professional men and women. The other???? Well,only if you like has-been losers trying so pathetically to grab attention in the nooks and crannies and gutter politics, all the while his personal life crumbles.
the town will move for summary judgment on all the counterclaims and third-party claims, and the motions will be granted. as soon as stuie moves for fees for representing himself, and as soon as the tears of laughter from the judge dry on the papers, stuie's motion will get flushed down the toilet. stuie's days of torturing and harassing people are coming to a rapid end.
So let me get this straight. Michelle spent every meeting attacking Stu. She and Lucas brought this bogus lawsuit that has cost the township's taxpayers $30,000 and has gone nowhere. They went after Stu, forfeiting the right to actually collect the costs of remediation from people any competent lawyer could have told them to go after, just because they wanted to harass him. They have constantly defamed him. Kathy Baratta was so vile, vicious, dishonest and unethical in her attacks on Stu she was fired for it, And you refer to "stuie's days of torturing and harassing people?" What drugs are you on. Stu never had anyone fired from their jobs in town hall. Not one person in three years on the township committee and one year as township attorney. Not one. While Michelle has been there she has tortured and caused to leave the adminsitrator, chief financial officer, animal control officer, DPW director, recreation director, several secretaries, orchestra conductor, and tortured several other key employees who have told her to stick it where the sun don't shine. And you have the audacity to say Stu tortured anyone? Well, you're about as clear on your facts as Kathy Baratta. Hmmm. Gee I wonder you could have written that post. Could it have been the wicked witch from Howell herself?
Oh by the way, Kathy, even though you were in the courtroom when it happened, the judge DENIED the motions on the third party claims by Lucas and others. Of course, you wouldn't know that, because it would mean you'd actually have to have LISTENED. That is something you were never able to do. You're only known skill was being able to put your byline on Michelle Roth's press release and pretend you wrote an article.
It's unbelievable that this clueless hag was actually the reporter assigned to Manalapan. After two years of reporting on this case, Kathy isn't aware that the Township can't file ANY motions on the third party claims since they're not party to the third party claims and there AREN'T any counterclaims for there to be summary judgment on!!! Wow. How pathetic. And of course, Kathy is unaware that two of the three judges have already put IN WRITING that Stu is entitled to fees for his own time if he brings a malicious prosecution case. But then, Kathy was never known to let the facts stand in the way of a good rant.
Hey Kathy, who's your legal consultant, Fred Stone? LOL.
Kathy couldn't afford Fred's $25-an-hour fees.
Post a Comment