Were Da Statements Made By State Assembly Candidate Roth A Public Relations Stunt To Combat Soon-To-Be Released Allegations Against Her?

We all know by now da historic Roth-O-Gram she made at da September Manalapan Township Committee meeting. Waiting until da meeting was almost over, with no way to comment, she lashed out at Manalapan Police Chief Stu Brown, making outrageous claims that in most businesses would have had da person she was talking about arrested. To recap, Roth stated:

"Sexual harassment, verbal abuse and abuse of power by Manalapan Police Chief Stuart Brown..."

"Chief Brown has a history of verbally assaulting and threatening women."

"Chief Brown’s attack last September on me..."

"Chief Brown’s rage."

"Chief Brown and his repetitive abusive behavior toward women."

"His demeaning language and threatening behavior."

"I do not want any other women to be victims of Chief Brown’s rage."

Of course, these were both sharp and vicious allegations, to be sure. If true, any person with female body parts from here to Zimbabwe would be in fear of Chief Brown. If true, any mammal of the female persuasion above and below da sea should hide from Chief Brown's alleged "rage."

But, here's da real question --- why did Queen Michelle Roth, da candidate for State Assembly pick that particular, time on that particular day to make da allegations that are sure to add more controversy to Manalapan?

Why?

Maybe, just maybe, it was a public relation's "Preemptive Strike!"

When someone tried to blackmail David Letterman, what did he do? He came out and announced it to da whole world - of course - leaving out his mea culpa his bedroom bachelor pad above his New York City TV studio.

Since she knew that in days, da lawyer for Chief Brown would have no choice but to take action against da actions of Roth, Tara Tiara and da Manalapan Township Committee, what did she do? She launched a public relation's "Preemptive Strike!"

But, what did da Queen have to deflect?

Could it be da bombshell allegations that can be found in a lawsuit filed by Chief Brown in a Monmouth County court?????

Thanks to of all people - a member of da Cadre - daTruthSquad has come into possession of a copy of da complaint submitted by da lawyer for Chief Stu Brown in da case of Brown vs Roth, Lovrich & Manalapan Township.

There are a number of allegations made in this bombshell complaint, some of which, if found true, could possibly warrant a criminal probe into da operation of Manalapan. Now, it is very important to note that anyone - anyone can make allegations against anyone else. Da Manalapan Legal Dream Team made pages upon pages of allegations against daTruthSquad in da now-infamous "Da Township of Manalapan vs Da Mosked Man" case - all of which were 110% disproved in a court of law.

You can read some of the more rediculous allegations here. It should be noted that these are "allegations," and may be true, and may not be true. Much like da evidence against both da Mosked Man and daTruthSquad, that will be for a judge to decide.

Now, with that said, here's da "worst of da worst" lowlights of da allegations made by Chief Brown and his attorney against da State Assembly candidate Queen:

* Number 9 Manalapan employees Alayne Shepler "harassed to the point of becoming seriously ill, and forced to retire. She was replaced by a younger person approved by da Queen.

* Number 10-13 - Jerry Collincini, the long time Director of Recreation / John Lewis, the only African-American Department head working for the Township was "asked" to retire. / Phil Del Turco, a respected financial officer who managed to keep taxes steady and even lower them, while maintaining the surplus / Mark Micali, the long time zoning officer, currently 57, Mark Solinski, the respected Animal Control Officer, currently 45, and Len Miller, the long time in-house engineer / These are all men - all alleged to have been forced to quit or cut loose, replaced by younger people approved by da Queen.

Then, came even harsher allegations - which daTruthSquad will discuss one by one:

* Number 20e - "Bucks Head Park, residents of the surrounding community appeared at a Township Committee meeting on November 28, 2007 to complain about conditions. They never received a response to their grievances from the Defendants. Unwilling to meet with them herself once she was appointed Mayor, Roth passed the buck to the Chief on March 14, 2008 demanding he meet with residents to eliminate their concerns. After he did so, Tara then complained to him that he had hosted a meeting with the residents and admonished him that the meeting should have been between the Township Committee and the residents."

So, what is being alleged here is da Queen wouldn't in effect leave her throne to meet with da peasants, so she ordered da Chief to do it, but never told Tara about it, placing da Chief in a bad light, and making him look bad, allegedly on purpose, to his boss (Tara Tiara).

* Number 20n - Defendants conspired with a former dispatcher to create a sexual harassment incident. The former dispatcher confronted Plaintiff at a bar, physically pushing him out the door and verbally assaulted him accusing him in front of other officers of having made a rude remark to her; a remark that would have been heard by the other ten officers had it been made. The Plaintiff insisted that the matter be investigated by internal affairs. The file disappeared. When he questioned the Internal Affairs officer1 as to the location of the file, he was told that the Administrator (Tara) had it. She refused to give him a copy. This is a violation of NJ Attorney General guidelines. Even worse, this confidential file was turned over to Roth and reviewed by her in violation not only of Attorney General guidelines but in violation of the Chiefs privacy rights.

If there's even a hint of datruth here, then this one mostl likely could require a state-led investigation due to alleged "NJ AG guidelines" violated. And, why would Roth review this case in da first place? Can't Tara Tiara handle her 6-figure job by herself? Shoulnd't a lawyer be looking into it? Da privacy issue alone is enough to make you sick with fear on what anyone can find out about you by simply being elected, using that elected position as a position of power.

* Number 20q - Roth falsely accused him in front of other chiefs of police of placing a 4th sergeant candidate into the interview selection process without authorization. The authorization had been provided by Tara.

Were da words "I'm sorry" left out of Public Relations school? Was this rectified? Apparently not, which leaves da Chief in a bad situation among his peers.

* Number 20t - On February 8 2008, Roth solicited directly from DSG (name omitted) a breakdown of what the Detective Bureau needed from the capital budget, deliberately circumventing the Chiefs authority and undermining his chain of command.

So, we can only guess at town hall, it's OK to get anything and everything from da town clerk with no need to go to da mayor, Tara Tiara, or any hired professional? If true, then yes, they tried to usurp his position. If it's da way things are, then there's no need to follow any chain of command, if those at da top don't follow it either.

* Number 20w - On June 13, 2008, Roth told detectives that if they don't have a car available, they can use the chiefs car.

If daTruthSquad's car is in da shop, does this mean I can go to Town Hall and anyone there can just give us Roth's car keys? Now, what if "any" person uses da Chief's car and crashes it? Who will have their name all over da accident - da Chief. Would you lend your car that you are responsible for to just anyone? Hey Queen, can we borrow your car this weekend? Oh, wait - at Manalapan Town Hall, we don't need to ask da Queen -- someone else will just give us da keys!

* Number 20y - Michelle and Tara presented false information to the County Prosecutor's office, including a claim that Plaintiff had agreed to accept a one day suspension for his "actions."

Hmmmmmm - - allegedly presenting false information to da County Prosecutor?????? This isn't a problem at all, if da County Prosecutor is "Mr. Smithers" and da Queen is played by Homer Simpson. If that were da case, Tara Tiara would be in da corner saying "DOH!" Since Manalapan isn't the ficticious Springfield, then maybe da County Prosecutor has a question or two to ask???? If not him, then maybe Annie Milgram????

* Number 20z - On April 22, 2009, Township Labor Attorney "McLaughlin out loud" falsely told the 1st Assistant Prosecutor that the Chief "reneged" on a one day suspension "deal" when the Chief had never agreed to such a thing.

Again, this is an alleged event. However, fool us once, shame on you. Fool us twice........

* Number 20aa - Roth made false accusations to professional associates of Plaintiff, that he was having a sexual affair with one of the Township attorneys.

You kind of knew sex would rear its ugly head in these allegations somewhere. At this point, it's probably safe to say da Queen has made soooo many accusations, we really can't tell anymore which is daTruth is and which is a "Roth-ism." It also doesn't beat the ever-popular "Take da Chief's car."

* Number 20bb - Roth told the first assistant prosecutor that Plaintiffs ski trip to New Hampshire in 2008 was improper because there "were only two bedrooms in the condo."

OK - we're going to give this one to da Queen. Does this mean, by her standards, a two-bedroom condo may be too small. Next time, maybe da chief should rent a villa, or mansion, or castle. And, much like da billing of da Manalapan Legal Dream Team, just bill it to da taxpayers, because much like da many lawsuits da Queens has been involved in Manalapan, da taxpayers are going to pay for it anyway. And, don't forget to get a receipt for the caviar, lobsters and filet mignon.

* Number 20ee - At an MCPO mediation meeting, McLaughlin-all-da-way-to-da-bank turned to the Chief and said, "Haven't you had enough?"

Apparently this Dream Teamer has had a lot of practice at this. Collincini, Del Turco, Shepler, Micali, Solinski, Miller, and so on, and so on, and so on.

* Number 20ff - Tara cancelled requisitions/purchase orders without informing the Chief.

Did Tara learn this in "Usurping Someone's Power 101?" Sure puts da Chief in a good light. You also have to wonder if da Verizon phone bill was included in there somewhere that got da phones in da police department turned off? That also begs da question -- does Tara work for da Queen - or does da Queen work for Tara? It gets confusing, doesn't it?

* Number 20kk - As the result of Roth's antagonizing the entire department with open hostility at contract negotiations meetings, the number of tickets issued by the officers dropped dramatically. While the Chief had nothing to do with this, and it was the direct result of Roth's own actions, Tara handed the Chief a memo on January 23, 2008, dated January 15, 2008, stating, "As Chief of Police, the Township expects you to resolve this situation immediately. The fact that you have failed to deal directly with your officers to resolve their neglect of duty and instead have chosen to act merely as a messenger of the statistics, is not appropriate. The Township must see immediate improvement. If not, you are expected to deal with offending officers to correct the problem."

This allegation is a very interesting one. Issue 1 - da Queen & Tara want police to write more tickets. Do they also want da fire department to fight more fires? If this allegation is true, then congratulations Manalapan, because it's now da job of Tara Tiara to demand more tickets be written. What's next - does Tara Tiara also demand who receives each ticket too? And, daTruthSquad would like to meet da "offending" officers here. Now, if da Queen gets a parking ticket, should she be upset with da officer or Tara? Wasn't it Tara Tiara who ordered more tickets be issued, according to da allegation? Does this mean it's OK for da Chief to send a note to Tara, demanding bills be paid on time? Should Democrats be blamed for a Manalapan ticket blitz? If this doesn't prove there is a serious problem with Manalapan's political heirarchy, then nothing will.

Of course, we won't even go into da Queen and Tara ordering da police to give out hundreds of donut coupons --- and yes -- that's in da complaint too!

DaTruth is, da complaint alleged by Chief Brown and his lawyer has all da bad bases covered -- alleged corruption by Township officials - political power moves - alleged lies to prosecutors - backstabbing - alleged demands for police to write more tickets, and da list goes on.

Here's a money saving idea - since it appears from what has been alleged that Tara Tiara wants to do every job in Manalapan, then fire da Chief, all da police officers, da town clerk, da municipal judge, everyone in DPW, da engineer, accountant and valet parking guy. If Tara can do all these jobs, then imagine how much money Manalapan taxpayers will save if we don't raise Tara's salary!

DaTruth is, what has been alleged here by da Mosked Man absolutely deserves an investigation, not by da Monmouth County Prosecutor who was allegedly lied to, according to da complaint filed by da Mosked Man, but by da US Attorney's office. Only this way will an investigation be non-partial and thorough. Too bad Chris Christie is running for governor. In his old job, a case like this would have been right up his alley.

So, was it really a pre-emptive strike by da Queen regarding Chief Brown's "rage?" It's looking more and more likely now, isn't it.

You decide for yourself. And that's daTruth.