Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Part 2 - Da Fleecing of Manalapan - Da Hidden Agenda?
This blog was born from necessity - da necessity for da truth to be told.
It was da necessity in 2006 when daTruthSquad discovered and uncovered da rift between GOP'ers Andy Boy Lucas and former Committeeman Joltin Joe Locricchio. That rift led to da GOP'er meltdown and da abandonment of Joltin Joe by da GOP'er heirarchy, led by Steve "Iron Girth" McEnery, who would later be identified by this blog as one of da "enforcers" in da room when Little Anna received her "Do Not Pass Go Or Else" pep-talk from chairman Pu-Pu.
This blog was also da first blog to discuss in detail da "backroom deal" which allowed Andy Boy to become Mayor with da votes needed by 2 Democrats to make that happen. When you are Manalapan mayor, you control certain appointments. Can it be explained rationally why a number of volunteer appointments went to Democrats once GOP Mayor Andy Boy began his rule? Can it be explained why, when da opening for WMUA Commish became available, Mayor Andy Boy was da deciding vote to put back in place da man Commish who gave Manalapan & Marlboro nearly 40% of sewer rate increases over 2 years - bypassing what has been reported as 3 GOP'ers in that 4-person room?
This blog was also da first to let da world know what transpired in da Town Hall when da husband of da Deputy Mayor Queen, when he voluntarily spoke before da committee answered a simple question by Joltin Joe by saying, "Because I Hate Italians." Political backers may have been able to silence others, and even da local Snoozepaper decided it wasn't worth reporting, but a bunch of NY & NJ radio & TV stations and other real newspapers thought otherwise,and thanks to this blog a severe injustice and act of what has been called bias by da press was brought to light.
It was also this blog that discussed both sides of da lawsuit now known as "Da Township of Manalapan vs. da Mosked Man," and included da possibility that da town could wind up on da losing end, and could potentially, depending on da court outcome, face a "Da Mosked man vs. Da Township of Manalapan" lawsuit, where da town could potentially face legal action to potentially recoup losses by da Mosked man.
Now this case, Da Township of Manalapan vs. da Mosked Man, what is it really about?
Is it about a land deal gone bad? Or, could it be about a government that demands a vocal critic be silenced because it bothers then to hear da truth?
If you read da Snoozepaper, you might be led to believe this is much ado about a land deal.
However, if you read da legal brief submitted by one Daniel McCarthy, representing Manalapan in "Da Township of Manalapan vs. da Mosked Man," you may think differently.
While Page 2 of da Certification of Daniel McCarthy dated August 3, 2007 discusses da Dreyer patch, Page 3 paints a very ominous picture. It states, "Da blog is entitled 'datruthsquad' and appears to be written by defendant." Pages 9 to 29 of the 29 page legal court brief are exhibits being used by Mr. McCarthy to make his case against da mosked man. These pages of evidence are not township letters or memorandum regarding da land deal. They are instead, numerous blog entries from a blogger known as daTruthSquad.
What does da blog known as daTruthSquad have to do with a land deal?
That very same question can be applied to da August 3, 2007 legal brief entitled "Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Application to Vacate."
On Page 6, Mr. McCarthy states, "Defendant has also discussed da various aspects of this matter on his internet blog, 'datruthsquad,'" as well as on Page 7, "Regarding defendant's internet blog datruthsquad." And, on Page 9, while discussing da gag order, "In violation of this order, defendant posted an entry in his internet blog....." As you read all 49 pages, you will find references to daTruthSquad all throughout this legal court document.
Again, what does da blog known as daTruthSquad have to do with a land deal?
Moreover, on Page 41 of that same legal court document, Mr. McCarthy states, "Defendants recent communications coupled with his attacks on Township officials posted on his blog, "datruthsquad" betray a mental instability and dangerous fixation on elected and appointed Township officials"
So again, what does da blog known as daTruthSquad have to do with a land deal?
Soon you will be reading stories in da Snoozepaper, and also in da Star Ledger.
Other news accounts will follow. Ask yourself this question - If this whole case is about a land deal, where are the many exhibits regarding da land deal? Why are page after page of these briefs discussing da internet blogger known as daTruthSquad?
Is this a legal case about a land deal gone bad? Or, is this a legal case where a governmental body has taken it upon themselves to use taxpayer dollars to divulge information about a blogger who lets da readers know what is really happening in one particular town?
Do you mind very much if your hard-earned tax dollars are used to unmask a vocal critic of government?
DaTruth is, as individuals we have da right to know how our tax dollars are being spent.
In da next daTruthSquad, we will discuss how just 3 out of 5 people can dictate how tens of thousands of YOUR tax dollars will be spent. And, we'll also discuss who these people are, as you have da right to know.
And that's daTruth.
It was da necessity in 2006 when daTruthSquad discovered and uncovered da rift between GOP'ers Andy Boy Lucas and former Committeeman Joltin Joe Locricchio. That rift led to da GOP'er meltdown and da abandonment of Joltin Joe by da GOP'er heirarchy, led by Steve "Iron Girth" McEnery, who would later be identified by this blog as one of da "enforcers" in da room when Little Anna received her "Do Not Pass Go Or Else" pep-talk from chairman Pu-Pu.
This blog was also da first blog to discuss in detail da "backroom deal" which allowed Andy Boy to become Mayor with da votes needed by 2 Democrats to make that happen. When you are Manalapan mayor, you control certain appointments. Can it be explained rationally why a number of volunteer appointments went to Democrats once GOP Mayor Andy Boy began his rule? Can it be explained why, when da opening for WMUA Commish became available, Mayor Andy Boy was da deciding vote to put back in place da man Commish who gave Manalapan & Marlboro nearly 40% of sewer rate increases over 2 years - bypassing what has been reported as 3 GOP'ers in that 4-person room?
This blog was also da first to let da world know what transpired in da Town Hall when da husband of da Deputy Mayor Queen, when he voluntarily spoke before da committee answered a simple question by Joltin Joe by saying, "Because I Hate Italians." Political backers may have been able to silence others, and even da local Snoozepaper decided it wasn't worth reporting, but a bunch of NY & NJ radio & TV stations and other real newspapers thought otherwise,and thanks to this blog a severe injustice and act of what has been called bias by da press was brought to light.
It was also this blog that discussed both sides of da lawsuit now known as "Da Township of Manalapan vs. da Mosked Man," and included da possibility that da town could wind up on da losing end, and could potentially, depending on da court outcome, face a "Da Mosked man vs. Da Township of Manalapan" lawsuit, where da town could potentially face legal action to potentially recoup losses by da Mosked man.
Now this case, Da Township of Manalapan vs. da Mosked Man, what is it really about?
Is it about a land deal gone bad? Or, could it be about a government that demands a vocal critic be silenced because it bothers then to hear da truth?
If you read da Snoozepaper, you might be led to believe this is much ado about a land deal.
However, if you read da legal brief submitted by one Daniel McCarthy, representing Manalapan in "Da Township of Manalapan vs. da Mosked Man," you may think differently.
While Page 2 of da Certification of Daniel McCarthy dated August 3, 2007 discusses da Dreyer patch, Page 3 paints a very ominous picture. It states, "Da blog is entitled 'datruthsquad' and appears to be written by defendant." Pages 9 to 29 of the 29 page legal court brief are exhibits being used by Mr. McCarthy to make his case against da mosked man. These pages of evidence are not township letters or memorandum regarding da land deal. They are instead, numerous blog entries from a blogger known as daTruthSquad.
What does da blog known as daTruthSquad have to do with a land deal?
That very same question can be applied to da August 3, 2007 legal brief entitled "Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Application to Vacate."
On Page 6, Mr. McCarthy states, "Defendant has also discussed da various aspects of this matter on his internet blog, 'datruthsquad,'" as well as on Page 7, "Regarding defendant's internet blog datruthsquad." And, on Page 9, while discussing da gag order, "In violation of this order, defendant posted an entry in his internet blog....." As you read all 49 pages, you will find references to daTruthSquad all throughout this legal court document.
Again, what does da blog known as daTruthSquad have to do with a land deal?
Moreover, on Page 41 of that same legal court document, Mr. McCarthy states, "Defendants recent communications coupled with his attacks on Township officials posted on his blog, "datruthsquad" betray a mental instability and dangerous fixation on elected and appointed Township officials"
So again, what does da blog known as daTruthSquad have to do with a land deal?
Soon you will be reading stories in da Snoozepaper, and also in da Star Ledger.
Other news accounts will follow. Ask yourself this question - If this whole case is about a land deal, where are the many exhibits regarding da land deal? Why are page after page of these briefs discussing da internet blogger known as daTruthSquad?
Is this a legal case about a land deal gone bad? Or, is this a legal case where a governmental body has taken it upon themselves to use taxpayer dollars to divulge information about a blogger who lets da readers know what is really happening in one particular town?
Do you mind very much if your hard-earned tax dollars are used to unmask a vocal critic of government?
DaTruth is, as individuals we have da right to know how our tax dollars are being spent.
In da next daTruthSquad, we will discuss how just 3 out of 5 people can dictate how tens of thousands of YOUR tax dollars will be spent. And, we'll also discuss who these people are, as you have da right to know.
And that's daTruth.