DaTruthSquad has to admit this is a very special week, and also one that gives one pause. It was 2 years ago that da Manalapan Legal Dream Team faced daTruthSquad and da Electronic Frontier Foundation in a Monmouth Court, with da goal of taking da Constitution of da United States, and da Bill of Rights, and makeing little paper airplanes out of them. Da Manalapan Legal Dream Team brought a lawsuit that was ordered by da Manalapan Township Committee with two sole purposes, embarrass da person they were suing for legal malpractice, and expose da writer and/or writers of this blog.
Da Manalapan Legal Dream Team claimed in absolutely no uncertain terms that this blog was written by none other than da Mosked Man himself, and he was in violation of a court order not to discuss da case. Their evidence was not actual pictures or video of da Mosked Man making a blog entry, or even secret video of him penning this blog, or eyewitness testimony from someone claiming he heard da Mosked Man boast this blog was his -- but was da blog itself -- and da inside information from da blog entries -- and their evidence was solely their "belief" that he was da writer.
Making matters worse -- da Manalapan Legal Dream Team had unlimited wealth to bankroll their work, because YOU DA TAXPAYER were paying their bills whether you wanted to or not -- because da Manalapan Township Committee ordered them to do it through their voting!
Two years ago, daTruthSquad was concerned when we received a subpoena from da Dream Team for everything under da sun. Da concern didn't stem from whether we would be pointed to as da blogger, but far worse -- that our First Amendment rights and da rights of others were being violated. Then, daTruthSquad came up with a plan of action that not only turned da tables on da Manalapan Township Committee Gang of Three, and forced da Manalapan Legal Dream Team to actually practice law, but took a plan that da Gang of Three wanted to keep in private and away from da people and exposed all of it for everyone to see!
It was late-September 2007 when daTruthSquad received notice it was being subpoenaed for information that anyone should not have to give. At issue wasn't just what da Gang of Three's Dream Team wanted.
At issue was da rule of law, anonymity, da basis of what was considered then and what was proven to be nothing more than a frivolous lawsuit, and a legal precedent that could take da Constitution of da United States and turn it into toilet paper.
With da EFF on our side, an organization whose purpose is to protect da rights of individuals, we decided to stand up to da bullies using all legal means at our disposal. Da EFF not only said they will not hand anything over and force da Dream Team's legal hand, but they took every shred of legal papers of da case and posted them on da internet for all to see, opening up da door for what became an unprecedented and shockingly revealing look into how da Manalapan Township Committee and their proxy's operate.
Everything from legal notices, to actual or in many cases alleged evidence, and even written correspondence between lawyers was posted for everyone to see! This became something Manalapan residents have never seen before -- exactly how your money was being spent on what may have been the most controversial period in Manalapan history!
While some Manalapan politicians promised transparancy in Town Hall but never delivered on that promise ---- daTruthSquad and da EFF made them keep that promise.
Three months later, in a Monmouth Court, da Dream Team's case now in front of a Superior Court Judge became, in effect, "Yes, da Mosked Man is daTruthSquad beyond a shadow of a doubt" -- to -- "Well, da Mosked Man is probably daTruthSquad" -- to -- "You know, it's a descent bet da Mosked Man is da Squad" -- to -- "Well, there's a one in 10 billion chance da Mosked man could be, but might be, but then again maybe it's da bearded guy in da corner or da guy panhandling outside da court."
Actually, according to da legal papers word for word, da Manalapan Legal Dream Team claimed da following:
In this legal document, da Manalapan Legal Dream Team made all of these claims saying daTruthSquad was da Mosked Man - with no actual evidence!
Now here's da entire transcript from da hearing. yes, it's pretty long, but as you read it, you can see page by page how da Manalapan Legal Dream Team's case began to crumble into dust.
Even before that, it was actually determined that da subpoena sent by da Dream Team wasn't even valid -- AND YOUR TAX DOLLARS PAID FOR THAT!!!
To make a long story short, what they wanted they couldn't get, because even if they could, they never filed da proper legal paperwork - AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE!!!!!
Beyond all that, their case would have set a precedent that would have made those who fought for our freedoms down da road at Monmouth Battlefield turn over twice in their graves. This country was founded by anonymous writers, including those who wrote da Federalist Papers - one of whom became a Supreme Court Justice, and other great patriots who said we don't have to take what da oppressive government of da day were handing us. Benjamin Franklin was an anonymous writer, maybe even da first blogger of da day. In this case, da government of Manalapan was using taxpayer money to fund a lawsuit nobody wanted in order to expose da people who were airing their dirty laundry.
Other times it was tried, in other cases, including a different landmark case in New Jersey. In each case across da nation, those who brought da cases all lost. In this case, not only did da township of Manalapan lose, but it also set a legal precedent that will, and we all pray, last forever -- and it's already been used as evidence in another legal case outside of New Jersey as a precedent!
In addition, what this case also did, and here's where your tax money comes into play again -- by losing this case in da way that they did, it cast da cloud of doubt over their entire legal malpractice case against da Mosked Man, by putting their credibility and theories into serious doubt. In da end, after 25 months of fighting, da Manalapan Township Committee couldn't even find one lawyer in da entire state who would take da case when their "contingency fee" attorney walked off da case!
So now, that case continues, but now it's da Mosked Man suing Manalapan and da politicians who went after him for 25 months of legal billing and to recoup 25 months of lost work due to da severity of da case they brought -- and could cost some a pretty penny to be sure.
As for "Da Township of Manalapan vs da Mosked Man," it cost taxpayers to be sure, and it also made Manalapan a laughingstock, because da story of how da town politicians were suing a blogger they didn't like spread around da world in publications in North and South America, Europe and Asia. During da height of da lawsuit, this blog was getting thousands of hits each day! And, this blog is still here "for all da people."
DaTruth is, daTruthSquad fought this fight not just for us, but for anyone who blogs, anonymously or not. You should have da right to speak out against what you feel isn't right. While you can't scream "fire" in a crowded theater, you can tell people what they may not know, or aren't getting from a local newspaper for whatever reason. You can do this through word of mouth, at a diner, or on a blog, whether you use your real name or not. As Americans, we have that right, and as long as our Republic endures, we always will.
In an ironic twist of fate, there are actually some individual who backed with words or deeds da Manalapan legal case against anonymity, yet post anonymous comments on message boards, contrary to da case they supported -- da height of hypocracy!
DaTruth is, if da axis of evil had won their case (and we all know it would have been turned over on appeal), then da rights we all share would have been seriously violated. Never again would anyone be able to speak out against what they believed was wrong without the extreme fear of reprisal. What Manalapan wanted to do was stop a whistelblower from airing their dirty laundry. In da end, da actions of a few politicians and their took away Manalapan's prestige when word spread around da world of their taxpayer-funded lawsuit attacking Freedom of Speech, and also cost Commissar Klauber his seat on da Township Committee, and da Queen her limousine ride to Trenton.
Through their minions, they claimed that da Founding fathers of our great nation didn't plan this for da Constitution. Apparently, they did not bother to learn a little history that many 3rd graders are taught, such as who da woman was who wrote riveting letters to da editor in a Boston newspaper was about issues of da day, who later turned out to be Benjamin Franklin, or da writers of da Federalist Papers - one who became da first Secretary of da Treasury, another a President of these United States, and da third was da first Chief Justice of da US Supreme Court - all writing under da anonymous name "Publius." Yes, da internet wasn't around in 1787, but da written word was - and those brave and wise men knew their laws must endure - and we thank God their wise vision still does today!
Let us never forget their sacrifices.
So yes, this is an important anniversary, for da patriots, for us, and da rule of law. And it will be remembered always. Our guess is, there are members of da Cadre who will also be remembering that this case quite possibly began their political downfall.
And that's daTruth.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
63 comments:
And it must not be forgotten that the person who was mayor in 2007 and who was the person MOST responsible for the frivolous malpractice case to begin with was Andrew Lucas. It was Andrew who insisted meeting after meeting that the case be brought. It was Andrew who authorized and pushed for the Katzenjammer kids representing the Township to go after datruthsquad because of his moronic belief that Stu was datruthsquad. Why is that important? Because in January, Andrew will become mayor again. In all likelihood, Stu will file his malicious prosecution lawsuit against Andrew immediately after Andrew is sworn in. In all likelihood, all of the headlines next year will be what Stu reveals about the "mayor" in 2010. Once again, Andrew as mayor will cause Manalapan to be a laughingstock just like it was the last time he was mayor. You see, none of your elected leaders, except Susan, cares about anything but politics. The Democrats and Ryan Green will vote for Andrew to be Mayor because it is politically expedient, knowing full well it will be a disaster for Manalapan. And they'll keep doing this until we get qualified people to run for office and elect them to get rid of the children of the corn currently running the asylum.
I think 2010 will be avery interesting year indeed for some folks like Andy Lukass. As much as I'd cringe if he becomes mayor again, I really hope he does, because the lawsuit we're all sure is coming will be that much sweeter.
"or da writers of da Federalist Papers - one who became da first Secretary of da Treasury, another a President of these United States, and da third was da first Chief Justice of da US Supreme Court - all writing under da anonymous name "Publius."
I didn't know that. Very astute observation Squad. If there was an internet back then, then maybe one of them would have been the Squad. Impressive.
You will not be forgotten for standing up to those thugs in Town Hall.
What ever happened to that other frivolous lawsuit filed against you by Spodak? Since you're still blogging, and since his scribe KB isn't publicizing it, my guess is it was probably tossed out with the other trash in court that day.
Thank you for standing up to all the bullies who try to use the courts for their own purposes.
Spodak's lawsuit was tossed out at least three months before he was still running around talking about how he was "getting close" to uncovering the bloggers. LOL. Those of us who knew this were loao while he was making a fool of himself -- as usual.
the anonymous writers of the federalist papers were hiding from a despot--george III--would wuuda had them drawn and quartered. you, on da udder hand, anr anonymous for da poipose of writing lies ablout innocent people. minor difference.
To the above posting:
Everyone knows how the Gang of Three spent taxpayer money to go after the Squad. Everyone knows the lengths they've gone to keep things hidden they don't want people to know. I applaud the Squad for telling us all what the evil Gang don't want people to know. Big difference.
I can remember a number of meetings at Manalapan town hall over the years when average citizens would gettheir chance to speak, only to be spoken down to by the Queen or Shapiro, or others would come up after them and make fun of them while the TC laughed.
I think what the DTS has done over the years in invaluable to Manalapan residents. There's a forum here to combat what the politicians are telling us that we all know are lies and distortions. Brvao to the DTS and to standing up to those bullis and cowards.
I remember when Larry Roth, the husband of a former mayor, answered a question to the township committee by saying "BECAUSE I HATE ITALIANS."
I also remember Roth and her minions all saying it never even happened. That is, until the video of it wound up on TV.
I remember them all saying it was a joke. But I also remember nobody laughing, and you never heard anyone laughing on the tape.
I also remember the Transcript not writing about it, while all the other newspapers and TV stations were here in Manalapan.
I also remember this lawsuit against Moskovitz. I first believed it was real, probably like everyone else. But after they lost their case to the Truthsquad, I realized immediately what this case was about. I will be voting against everyone who started it, just like I did this year with Roth and Klauber. I think we owe that much to the Truthsquad, and to ourselves to rid this town of the corruption and cronyism that has taken over the town hall.
Does anyone post here who isn't Stuart J. Moskovitz, Esq., as he likes to call himself, or one of his shrinking band of misfit sychophants?
If "Squad" is not Stuart J. Moskovitz, Esq., then why in the world would someone devote 100% of his blog to matters that could only be of interest to Stuart J. Moskovitz, Esq.?
What lawyer do you know other than Stuart J. Moskovitz, Esq. who refers to himself as an "Esquire", as if this were a title that you earned and can bestow on yourself simply by virtue of having been admitted to the practice of law?
When Stuart J. Moskovitz no longer has his license to practice, will he still call himself Stuart J. Moskovitz, Esq.?
I had to do some checking into the law database and found the lawsuit you mention regarding "George Spodak." I'm sorry to say, but what was available to read about it, there was not much of a case here. The plaintiff alleged his reputation was tarnished by a series of anonymous screen name writers, including the name "daTruthSquad." However, the plaintiff would have to actually prove damages in order to have a case, and it appears that the plaintiff in this matter could not do that.
What is even more alarming about the case, from what I read, was there was actually no direct evidence that any person or persons with the screen name "daTruthSquad" ever wrote anything defamatory in nature against the plaintiff, yet was still named as a defendant.
In many states, New Jersey among them, the person or persons who are "daTruthSquad" could in fact now bring a legal claim of wrongful prosecution against Mr. Spodak, if they were so inclined.
In some states, New Jersey among them, anyone can literally file a claim against anyone for anything. Evidence, however, is something that many people who want to become plaintiffs sometimes don't have, yet move forward anyway.
I had to do some checking into the law database and found the lawsuit you mention regarding "George Spodak." I'm sorry to say, but what was available to read about it, there was not much of a case here. The plaintiff alleged his reputation was tarnished by a series of anonymous screen name writers, including the name "daTruthSquad." However, the plaintiff would have to actually prove damages in order to have a case, and it appears that the plaintiff in this matter could not do that.
What is even more alarming about the case, from what I read, was there was actually no direct evidence that any person or persons with the screen name "daTruthSquad" ever wrote anything defamatory in nature against the plaintiff, yet was still named as a defendant.
In many states, New Jersey among them, the person or persons who are "daTruthSquad" could in fact now bring a legal claim of wrongful prosecution against Mr. Spodak, if they were so inclined.
In some states, New Jersey among them, anyone can literally file a claim against anyone for anything. Evidence, however, is something that many people who want to become plaintiffs sometimes don't have, yet move forward anyway.
Only a lunatic could imagine that a Web site that endorsed Klauber for re-election could have anything at all to do with Stu Moskovitz.
To Freddie: I can understand why YOU wouldn't refer to yourself as "Esq." since you recognize you're not really a lawyer. But every lawyer I've ever met, you know every legitimate lawyer, signs his name with "Esq." So I don't know why in your obsessed little perverted mind, that would seem so unusual to you. Maybe because the only lawyers who ever contacted you don't use "Esq.", they use "Assistant Attorney General". Anyone reading datruthsquad can see they write about anything affecting Manalapan, not just Stu. But YOU seem to be unable to write anything other than about Stu. Don't accuse others of your psychosis. And next time, at least wear a CLEAN bathrobe, will you?
Isn't it true that in the case of certain types of defamatory statements--like calling someone a child molester--that it's deemed defamatory "per se", and it's not necessary to prove actual damages to recover money in a civil action?
To be fair, I was the one who wrote the comment, "I had to do some checking into the law database.."
From a legal standpoint, leaving a case open "Without Prejudice" simply means that it can be refiled at a later date. It does not mean that either side was right or wrong. However, if reopened without iron clad evidence, a judge would usually be more apt to dismiss a case such as this.
Again, while this form of law is not my legal expertise, it should be noted that any first year litigator will tell you that there must be proof of damage for it to move forward. It is likely, but I am not the plaintiff's attorney, that they realized this could be dismissed and simply beat the judge to it.
With that said, calling someone a "child molestor" without solid evidense is something I would tell a client not to do. While it is legal to state an opinion, you cannot say, "It's my opinion that (blank) is a child molestor." You can, of course, say, with evidense, "I find it highly unusual that a man of his age entertains young boys in his residence. Do their parents know?"
I have read this blog extensively. As a matter of fact, I know since the 2007 legal verdict that at least one law school uses that case as a lesson in their course study regardingthe precedent it set. This blog, at least from what I have read, does not cross the threshold legally of any wrongdoing.
no lawyer worth his salt calls himself "esq." it's a meaningless honorarium by which others show respect, and not just to lawyers, because it has no historical relationship to the practice of law other than by custom. any lawyer who thinks otherwise is a horse's rear-end.
once again, Larry, you have proven you are clueless as your wife. EVERY lawyer uses "Esq." just like every medical doctor calls himself doctor. And by the way, why are you even bringing this up? I doubt very much Stu writes to a racist like you or speaks to you, so it looks like you're running out of things to use to express your insane obsession and jealousy.
to Sir Walter Mastovitz -- obviously one of the four of Kathy's clowns who prove day after day, they have no idea what they're talking about, they just desperately need attention. That posting may be one of the dumbest postings ever. Anyone who's ever hired an attorney knows they sign their name "Esq." Jeez, you people are an embarrassment. Larry Roth, Fred Stone, Gerry Ward, George Hartigan, Kathy B. Do you not realize how ridiculous you sound? And all the while, every time you attack Stu, he makes more and more money. That's how ridiculous you are. Ask Shapiro. Ask Michelle Roth. Ask Lucas. Every time you attack him, five other people hire him. LOL. Maybe that's because you keep proving he's a lot brighter than you guys.
For someone who claims to be such an expert on usage, it might be a good idea to learn the meaning of words that you yourself use:
"
hon·o·rar·i·um audio (n-râr-m) KEY
NOUN:
pl. hon·o·rar·i·ums or hon·o·rar·i·a (--) KEY
A payment given to a professional person for services for which fees are not legally or traditionally required."
What is the payment involved with using the title "Esq."?
Try taking a guess about what the real word you want is, Mr. Expert.
I don't think the title Esquire really matters.
There's all kinds of lawyers. Good ones, bad ones, ones that have been fined by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and those who haven't been investigated by the Feds.
Just like there's many types of reporters. Some write for the New York Times. Some can't even hold a jobs with the News Transcript.
"And all the while, every time you attack Stu, he makes more and more money."
wow, somebody's real plugged in to Stu, or Stu is posting. Either way, since everything Stu says is a lie, this proves that he's starving to death.
sorry, meant "honorific"
next case:
esquire definition
es·quire (es′kwīr′; e skwīr′, i-)
noun
Historical a candidate for knighthood, acting as attendant and shield-bearer for a knight; squire
in England, a member of the gentry ranking just below a knight
a title of courtesy, usually abbreviated Esq., Esqr., placed after a man's surname and corresponding more ceremoniously to Mr
Archaic a landed country gentleman; squire
so, "Stuart Moskovitz, Esq." sounds a lot like a contradiction of terms.
What is up with your fascination with Stu Moskovitz? Do you not have any life of your own? Are you jealous of him? Are you jealous of his taving the title Esquire? Get a job at K-Mart or something and get soem sort of a life for yourself. I'm really starting to feel sad for you.
Every time I go on this site and read the comments by Fred, several things come to mind. 1. Stu wrote Miracle's Law, the anti-pedophile ordinance. 2. Someone has posted numerous times, an email that claims to have been from Fred to Stu screaming at Stu for writing Miracle's Law. 3. Shortly after that email appeared, Fred started forging emails from Stu and posting them on the hate site and gave them to Spodak who, like a good little trained dog, read them at the Township Committee meetings, swearing they were true even though he doesn't have a computer and would have no possible way of knowing whether or not Fred forged them -- so much for George's credibility. 4. Fred has been asked dozens of times to state why he was so obsessed with Stu, a guy who hasn't even been in office since 2001, if it wasn't because of Miracle's Law. 5. Fred has never been able to do so.
You can draw your own conclusions, but it's pretty obvious, isn't it?
I never heard of someone "taving" a title. What does that mean exactly? Aren't you the guy who posts about learning the meaning of the words people write? Also, you spend more time defending Moskovitz than everyone you claim attack him. What’s that all about?
By the way, please tell us if YOU have "soem" sort of life. We would all be interested in knowing what that means. Thanks in advance.
By the way, we don't feel sad for you.
NO ONE spends more time than you, Fred and Larry Roth thinking about Stu. If you read the posts by datruthsquad, less than five percent of what they write is about Stu, if that. Yet almost 100% of everything written by Fred, and Larry are about Stu, and George has never attended a township committee meeting without having everyone laugh at him because of his obsession with Stu. So, I wouldn't be talking about how much time anyone else speaks about Stu. But here's what you've managed to prove. For years, Jim Gray has gone around referring to himself as Mr. Manalapan. Yet, few people remember him and people rarely talk about him. It seems that when you talk about Manalapan politics the elephant in the room has been Stu, and will be for a long time. Let's face it, hopelessly depressed losers like Fred, Larry, George, Shapiro, Kathy, Lucas, McEnery and Ward (not a successful career in the bunch,did you notice?) constantly obsess over Stu. They wake up in the morning thinking about him and they go to sleep at night thinking about him. Nobody obsesses about anyone else who either was or is in Manalapan politics. So all these losers are proving is that Stu is still the most influential man in Manalapan. I think, judging by the obsession with him on the hate site, and here, and NJ.COM and at township committee meetings, he ought to be the News Transcript's man of the year!!
try putz of the year, maybe decade.
You sycophants think what you want. Next year you'll see the real power in Manalapan, and its not your leader Esq.
"putz of the year." Typical Fred Stone comment. And this man claims to be educated. He has never posted a coherent statement out of the thousands of rants he wastes his time and ours posting. You've never heard a statement from Stu that was of such little dignity and intelligence as Fred posts constantly. That's why Fred is a disgraced failure and Stu is the politicians' obsession. Clean your bathrobe Fred. Have some dignity.
I recently checked out the Manalapan HATE website, and I found a thread from someone posting as "Fred Stone" (if that is his real name) who claims he has posted anonymously on this blog site. Why would nayone who makes posts on the HATE website under what may be their real name post anonymously here? Aren't they against anonymity? Isn't that what the Roth and Lucas led lawsuit against this blog site was all about?
Talk about a contradiction in terms.
It wouldn't surprise me if one of those sycophants on the hate website tries to file a lawsuit against this site, now that Spodak's lawsuit was tossed out of court like so much garbage. In a way, I hope they do, because then they'll have to stand up and admit they too post on this site.
Hey Squaddo, promise us all that if you get sued by those crazies, this time you'll sue them back.
I find it strange that the DTS didn't file a retaliatory lawsuit in either the Manalapan case or the Spodak case. If I were in their shoes, I would in a minute.
That's why I don't think this blog has anything to do with Moskovitz, because when he gets sued, he sues back twice as hard.
Somebody once posted on another site that when Spodak won his case and exposed the Truth Squad and others, they'd have a huge celebration or build a swimming pool or something like that.
I guess now that his lawsuit was apparently thrown out, they'll be eating off the dollar menu and do a lap in their bathtub.
It ain't over 'till it's over.
- Yogi Berra
" 4. Fred has been asked dozens of times to state why he was so obsessed with Stu, a guy who hasn't even been in office since 2001, if it wasn't because of Miracle's Law. 5. Fred has never been able to do so.
You can draw your own conclusions, but it's pretty obvious, isn't it?"
Interesting. here it is a day later and a dozen additional posts by Fred, and he still remains unable to provide any explanation other than Miracle's Law for his obsession with Stu. Yes, it's VERY obvious.
My problem is that I never know who I am half the time. Does this happen to anyone esle?
stuart moskovitz knows that it's because stuart moskovitz posts vicious lies about fred and others, not because of miracle's law. fred has said it 100s of times, but stuart moskovitz would prefer to keep lying rather than tell the truth, even if he loses his license to practice as a result.
esquire--what a pitiful joke.
No Fred, just you. Maybe if you got your own life, instead of obsessing over everyone else's, you'd have a better self-identity.
"Interesting. here it is a day later and a dozen additional posts by Fred, and he still remains unable to provide any explanation other than Miracle's Law for his obsession with Stu. Yes, it's VERY obvious."
He doesn’t need to provide you or anyone else with an explanation. It's as obvious as the bulbous nose on your face why he goes after Stu. Fred doesn’t obsesses over Stu, he CALLS HIM OUT. What's you need to ask yourself is why the hero of the stupid takes it lying down. Why is that? Well THAT'S WHAT IS OBVIOUS.
Congrats Squad for keeping the First Amendment alive. Without you, I'd really wonder if we'd be able to speak unless we were on the side of those who control Manalapan Town Hall.
"stuart moskovitz knows that it's because stuart moskovitz posts vicious lies about fred and others, not because of miracle's law"
Sorry Fred, that's not going to fly. There is absolutely no proof whatsoever that Stu has EVER posted. You're just making that up to cover up the fact that it is ALL about Miracle's Law. You've been asked time and again to prove your vicious allegations that Stu is posting. You never have. You never will. You can't prove what isn't true. You are a disgusting, washed up vicious fraud, Fred. And you try to build yourself up, a disgraced securities fraud artist, by attacking someone whose shoes you couldn't shine. It is ALL about Miracle's Law and everyone knows it and everyone will always know it until you can come up with something you can prove that shows otherwise. Remember, you were fined for lying, for scamming, for conning, Fred. That's a fact. So we're not buying your nonsense that your obsession with Stu is anything other than Miracle's Law. Stu has never posted. Your saying he is, is just another lie from someone who received national headlines for lying, Fred - you.
Hey Fred, where's your proof that Stu has ever posted anything? That's what I thought. You're a fraud, Fred. Eliot Spitzer proved it and you're proving it all over again. You've been jealous of Stu since you first met him ten years ago. Even though every lawyer uses Esq., you're obsessed with it. Every lawyer who reads your posts laughs at you for trying to make people think that there's something wrong with a lawyer having the title Esq. I guess to someone like you who was suspended, a lawyer using Esq. is unusual. Not to lawyers who actually practice it's not. Get lost Fred. You're hysterical jealousy is boring us. The first amendment doesn't require a blogsite to bore its readers with the insane rantings of a social deviate. Datruthsquad is doing us all a disservice by printing anything a fraud like you writes.
To datruthsquad:
Please explain why we are subjected to the disgusting defamation by this person Fred who obviously had reason to be upset by Stu's writing Miracle's Law. He's making this site no better than the hate site. That's nothing for you to be proud of. Keep printing his disgusting hate posts and you'll end up with the same number of readers as that other site he destroyed.
Don't you get it, Fred Stone? No one cares what you have to say. No one. That's why no one reads the hate site any more. Stu served this town as a successful Mayor. He served this town successfully as its township attorney in spite of the attempts by your troll friends to discredit him. And what have you done, Fred? You infuriated the Asian community with your vicious racist attacks against them while on the zoning board. You are a discredited former attorney caught defrauding your clients by making up fake mutual fund companies. Seriously, we aren't interested in anything you have to say. Just go away. Get back in your bathrobe and slippers and bother the people in Shop Rite. We'd like to reserve this site for decent honest, law abiding people who aren't obsessed day and night, week after week, year after year with the person who wrote the anti-pedophile law. We all look forward to the time a certain former 12 year old returns to Manalapan. Maybe that will shut you up.
Could there be links to a nearby $70 million default last week?
No one reads the hate site? LOL, I have to laugh. Every time a new comment goes up on KB's site, 6 - 12 "guests" are reading it. You people are pathetic. Reserve this site for decent honest people? You are the worst of the worst this town has to offer. You have some nerve calling yourself decent and honest.
The only thing that's going to shut anyone up is finding out who you are and that's going to happen long before some fictitious, former 12 year old boy comes back to Manalapan, you slug.
Once again, Fred is unable to come up with any explanation for his obsession with Stu other than the fact that Stu wrote Miracle's Law. His accusations that Stu is posting just proves it's all about Miracle's Law. Fred has no proof Stu is posting anything anywhere or ever has. So that's hardly the reason Fred is posting.
"Every time a new comment goes up on KB's site, 6 - 12 "guests" are reading it. You people are pathetic."
WOW! I guess I was wrong about KB's site. 6 to 12 people, that's 3 times more people than I thought EVER read her site. Maybe that means if she sells it, she might be able to get 10 cents for it now!
If you guys think 6-12 people constitutes a large reader base, then you probably worked for the Transcript. What a joke.
"Every time a new comment goes up on KB's site, 6 - 12 "guests" are reading it."
Guess that's only a few thousand less than who read this blog daily. They're worse losers than I thought.
FYI, as much as I think Fred's vile posts belong on the hate website IMHO, he still has the right to have his posts put here. First, it shows what kind of person he truly is, and it's also the freedom of speech the Squad fought for, even though Fred's friends don't believe in freedom of speech.
Personally, I love the way people on the HATE website say they are against anonymous bloggers and despise them, but they're the exact same people who then post on this blog and sign as anonymous, or use names like tesla or others on njo.com.
It really shows how much power this blog has over them, and that Stu has over them. What pathetic people they must be.
At least here you get the real story, or at the worst close to it, from actual inside people. You don't get this anywhere else. That's why I read this site. Everybody knows it because since this website started, it has infuriated people like Roth and her minions because now they're exposed by their own insider and there's nothing they can do about it.
Keep up the good work Squad.
squad, who writes your material, arnold stang? oh, wait, he died. must be stu.
Remember Dan McCarthy, the embarrassment of an attorney hired by Michelle Roth in exchange for campaign contributions, the head of the "dream team" notorious for the litigation to nowhere that cost Manalapan taxpayers $100,000 before Klauber and Roth ran away with their tails between their legs? Read this from Linden, where he's also screwing the taxpayers:
http://nfslindenforum.blogspot.com/2009/10/hear-any-good-lawyer-jokes-lately.html
After you read this, remember, he's still the planning board attorney in Manalapan and Michelle Roth is going to insist on rehiring him next year. Andrew Lucas will, as he always does, give Michelle whatever she wants.
wait, squadro is roth's insider? now I know why i 'm confused all the time!
Great find on that story about Daniel McCarthy. Another reason this blog is so good.
Another day, another three or four attacks by Fred against Stu, another failure by Fred to come up with any believable reason he's so pathetically obsessed with Stu other than the fact that Stu wrote the anti-pedophile ordinance.
No Fred, you're confused all the time because your mind is rotting from lack of use since you were suspended for securities fraud. Maybe if you got a job, you wouldn't be hallucinating about Stu all the time and wouldn't be so confused.
That Linden blog about McCarthy rings so true after seeing the dismal performance of him and his associates on Court Street. The details of the March hearing, recounted to the Township Committee and posted here, show just how bankrupt and ill prepared those people are.
♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸♥ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪We Wish You a Merry ♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸♥ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪Christmas ♥ ♥ ♥We Wish You A Merry ♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸♥ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪Christmas ♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸♥ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪...And A Happy New Year!♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸♥ ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪...
Happy Holidays to everyone. May 2010 be a better year than 2009 and may Manalapan be a better place with no more corruption in our Town Hall purportrated by the politicians that think only of themselves.
Amen to cleaning up town hall. With Klauber out, there's one less crony. In 2010, we can vote Luckass out and remove 2 cronies from town hall in 2 years. In 2011, we can vote Roth and Holland out and take back Town Hall!
That's my Christmas wish.
Post a Comment