Friday, December 12, 2008

Is a Manalapan Dream Team Lawyer Working For Free?

Thanks to da old phrase, "Step 1 - Take Foot & Step 2 - Insert Foot in Mouth," there are even more twists and turns in da ongoing saga of “Da Township of Manalapan vs Da Mosked Man” taxpayer funded lawsuit. Da latest twist came out of a random series of events that alone, would have gone completely unnoticed. However, thanks to a surprising TruthTeller who was trying to make a point in favor of da Gang of Three’s agenda, it now may have thrust Committeeman Cash Klauber directly into da crosshairs of da lawsuit – and at da same time, squarely put his own integrity on da line!

It happened in da first December Manalapan Township Committee meeting. A citizen went before da committee for their 5 to 18 minutes of fame, and brought up da question of how much da lawsuit has cost.

That question brought up a volley of responses, first by Cash Klauber, who claimed on da record that da town has only spent $6,000 of taxpayer money on da case – specifically, for an “expert” witness. Cash sounded very sure of himself, and nobody should immediately jump to any conclusions that he was making a false statement, since he did sound that sure of that figure, almost like he was told that, or at least that's the impression it gave.

Let’s first examine that Cash claim.

Now, personally, I’d love to believe Cash and take his statement for daTruth. However, da last time something like that happened, a soldier kneeling next to General George Custer said to him, “Look, over da ridge – I think they’re friendly Indians.”

FACT: da “expert” witness in this case has been identified as Robert Renaud, who, according to Snoozer editor Mark Rosman in da now-infamous “Rosman Editorial,” which became evidence in da even more-infamous legal case, has been paid approximately $6,400 at $350 per hour for his “expert” testimony.

CASH-ISM – if Cash is accurate, then it must be surmised that another Manalapan Legal Dream Team member, attorney McCarthy, has done a ton of legal work for absolutely no pay whatsoever!

According to evidence compiled by daTruthSquad, one can only surmise that Mr. McCarthy submitted to da court a 29-page “Legal Certification” THAT WAS COMPLETELY FREE OF CHARGE TO MANALAPAN & ITS TAXPAYERS.

McCarthy said in his allegedly 29-page “free” certification, “By letter dated July 13, 2007, I advised defendant that my firm was Special Counsel to da Township in this matter and that we would reply to his demand for indemnification. I further requested that Defendant communicate directly with my office regarding matters pertaining to this action …”

So, according to Cash’s statement, McCarthy wrote this 29-page Certification, and ordered da Mosked Man to communicate with “his office,” at any time, and he would not charge a dime for his services & time?

Da Legal Value MenuSince apparently Mr. McCarthy had free time and apparently according to Cash's statement apparently not in the charging mood, on December 21, 2007, why was he in court speaking on behalf of Manalapan to da judge in da case against daTruthSquad, when McCarthy alleged in his legal filings that da Mosked Man was daTruthSquad?

Da certification clearly came from McCarthy's firm - and not da contingent fee-based Weeks form, so, either Mr. McCarthy is doing a ton of legal work for absolutely no pay, as Cash alleged since only da “expert” was paid, according to Cash, or there’s a serious problem with his statement that may warrant an investigation.

Now, one might find this surprising, but daTruthSquad actually has respect for Cash Klauber - and a little sympathy too since any aspirations by Cash becoming Mayor of Manalapan in 2009 are about as thin as a receding hairline. DaTruthSquad would like to believe that Cash merely did not have all da facts at his disposal when he said that da case of “da Township of Manalapan vs da Mosked Man” has only cost $6,000 over da past 2 years. So, lets, for da sake of argument, take Cash at his word again.

First – If Cash is correct, and Township taxpayers have only paid for an “expert,” then there should be absolutely no payments made to Mr. McCarthy for his 29-page “Certification,” nor for his appearances at any of da courtrooms during da case. A completely transparent outside forensic audit of all payments made to McCarthy over da past 3 years should commence immediately to prove that either Mr. McCarthy is working out of da kindness of his heart, or Cash’s statement may have been in serious error.

Second – This situation alone should negate any possibility of Mr. McCarthy or anyone from his firm becoming Township attorney, specifically due to what can be perceived as a conflict.

ThirdDa Rosman Editorial stated that “victories (against Moskovitz) come with a price of keeping MachoGrande, Renaud, McCarthy, and Weeks working and da meter still running.” This means either Cash is right and Rosman was 100% wrong, or Rosman was right and Cash has been given wrong information – and if that is da case – who gave Cash that alleged wrong info?

DaTruth is, there has been a concerted effort to not let anyone know exactly how much this case against da Mosked man has cost from da very beginning. It was Andy Boy in 2007 who said and was quoted as saying da case has cost taxpayers, "over $100,000!" DaTruthSquad may not be "Mr. Wizard" when it comes to math, but any 2 year old will tell you there's a big difference between "$6,000" and "over $100,000."

When Carolina MachoGrande wasn't calling anonymous bloggers "Bomb Throwers," she also is quoted as saying this case wasn't costing any money, since da lawyer was on a contingency fee. This means that same lawyer must not have charged for anything as of yet, because all da money according to Cash has gone to da "expert."

DaTruth is, thanks for all this info cannot be given to daTruthSquad. Thanks to TruthTellers like former mayor Spodak, who continues to bring up this case on a regular basis, questions continue to rise due to da statements made by Manalapan Township Committeepeople.

DaTruth is, it’s also another reason that outside investigators are needed to sort out whether or not this is an actual legal case or a vindictive lawsuit funded by taxpayers whether they like it or not.

And that’s daTruth.

97 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn

Anonymous said...

Andrew, why are you yawning. Don't you know this is all going to be coming out of your pocket at the end of the day? By the way, do you really think you're impressing anyone by proving you have no life and can spend all day online -- when you're not spending it with your special friend Peter Hall -- making sixth grader comments like the one above? Since it's not likely you'll ever grow a pair (you can't even face residents at the public meetings) maybe you can at least try to grow UP.

Anonymous said...

I'd be crying, if there weren't so much truth to this. There's no way McCarthy did any work for free. The proof was in those legal papers which are evidence in the trial.

Personally, I don't believe Klauber was lying. IMHO I think he was very misinformed, which in itself doesn't bode well for the Queen and her gang.

Anonymous said...

Maybe its time for another Rosman editorial? He got under some nerves the first time.

Anonymous said...

While you're looking at all the legal bills, maybe you can also look at why the Township Engineer got away with billing $60,000 in engineering costs for a $10,000 cleanup. I had the oil tank taken out of my back yard last year when I put a pool in. We received DEP certification and the total cost INCLUDING ALL ENGINEERING FEES was 13,500. Isn't there anyone at town hall that can actually figure out when we are getting screwed by the professionals? Is there anyway we can get a business administrator for the township that has a clue?

Anonymous said...

I agree. You have a township administrator and a CFO who have never challenged a single penny of CME's $1,000,000 billing per year. Not one penny. Now you understand why they pushed through the 7 million dollar wreck center (guess who gets rich off of that) and the 1.5 million dollar purchase of contaminated land that was appraised at 700,000.

Anonymous said...

Yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn.

Quit crying, ya cry baby (note the singular reference)

Anonymous said...

Don't you have anything else to talk about? I mean, jeez, Louise. Here's why I have to laugh. You think you are so superior to everyone, that you actually think everyone will buy this nonsense. Your ego is writing checks your body can't cash, or won't be covered by outside agencies, schmoe.

Anonymous said...

Well, here it is, the weekend. Another weekend, another bottle of Jack Daniels for McEnery and another posting attacking Stu. McEnery, quit crying and get a life. Stu's living his life, why can't you live your own? Oh, I forgot, who the heck would want to live your life. Roll over and have another swig before someone gets confused and tries to tow you back into the ocean.

Anonymous said...

hey McEnery, how was that "unity" party. Did the six of you enjoy it?

Anonymous said...

Stop picking on my 300 pound best bud. If it wasn't for him, I might be stuck actually being a freeholder.

Anonymous said...

Oh my god. Not another blog about the freakin law suit....Nobody cares!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

if nobody cares, why does Spodak bring it up at every meeting? If nobody cares, why does KB attend every hearing? If nobody cares, why do Andrew and McEnery keep posting about it? If nobody cares, why is it in the News Transcript every week? If nobody cares, why don't they just drop it instead of spending all of our tax dollars on this joke of a lawsuit? If nobody cares, why did Andrew bother to violate a court order in the lawsuit just to attack his former running mate? If nobody cares, why have the last two meetings been all about this lawsuit with Andrew feeling the need to attack someone who was in the hospital? I think everybody cares. I know that the residents care about the fact that their taxes in Manalapan are rising faster than in any other municipality in Monmouth County and those taxes are paying for this nonsense. And you're going to see just how much they care because this year the republicans are actually going to run a campaign and Klauber will learn what being irresponsible with taxpayers dollars does when there's a real party in opposition, and not an election thrown by McEnery for his personal gain.

Anonymous said...

Hey guys!! It's Saturday Night! Time for McEnery to get drunk and start posting about Stu again. YEA!

Anonymous said...

Hey guys? LMAO. It's just you, you knucklehead.

Anonymous said...

there's McEnery, right on schedule. Hateful as usual. Wrong as usual. Drunk as usual.

Anonymous said...

What was hateful about that last post? What made you think the poster was drunk? You are a liar and a vicous rumor spreader, not to mention the fact that you are a hate monger who is tearing this town apart, for your own, sick, twisted reasons. Get out of our town, town wrecker!

Anonymous said...

yaaaawwwwwnnnnn. Maybe you should try decaf

Anonymous said...

Here is what is hysterical. You have no life. All you do is wait for me to post, so you can babble. Absolutley, HYSTERICAL. Am I gettin' to ya, town wrecker? Because everyone knows, that's what you are :)

Anonymous said...

Meat Fraud, aka 95% of the posters here. You are PATHETIC. Go back and kneel at the feet of your master :)

Anonymous said...

yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn. Maybe you should try decaf. We're on to you, loser.

Anonymous said...

George Spodak and Barney Frank. Really, dumb down Barney Frank about 100 points and who do you have? Same shape. Same voice. Same uncontrolled rage. They look alike, they talk alike. Are they cousins? Identical cousins?

Anonymous said...

Ask Klauber how he feels about deceivng the public with his 6K quote.

Anonymous said...

Andrew Lucas is going to cost the township $10,000. Can you say ...DEDUCTABLE?

Now, how much was the remediation?

Lucas is just another politician raping the residents taxes. Health insurance and legal fees, how much more must we pay for a volunteer?

Anonymous said...

Let's answer the questions from "Estrogen Boy said"

1) Spodak is mostly focused on the violation of executive session, not the lawsuit itself

2)McHenry and Andrew don't post about this. You say they post about this but that doesn't make it true.

3)All our tax dollars are not being spent on this. Another gross exageration.

4) Andrew didn't vioate a court order. That is your ill-informed opinion.

5)Last two meetings were not ALL spent on the law suit. Another gross exageration.

6) This law suit has been going on for quite some time. You have been nagging everyone about this forever. If you had any influence or if anybody cared about this, roth would have lost in a landslide.

IPSO FACTO NOBODY FREAKIN CARES ABOUT THIS CASE EXCEPT A NEARLY BALD, NEARLY 60 YEAR OLD OUT OF SHAPE PUBLICITY STARVED TROUBLEMAKER AND A DOZEN RENEGADE REPUBLICANS FOLLOWING HIS DICTATES. ENJOY 2009. I KNOW I WILL.

Anonymous said...

Wrong again Andrew.
1. Spodak is not focused on violation of executive session, because he's never said anything about the violations of executive session by Lucas, that have occurred frequently. And he has been annoying everyone for a year and a half about this lawsuit.

2. McEnery and Andrew DO post about this -- the perfect evidence of this is your post that I'm responding to, Andrew.

3. True "All" of our tax dollars are not being spent on this. Just tens of thousands of dollars being wasted on it. Much more is being wasted on Roth's other hairbrained schemes.

4. Andrew was ordered not to go anywhere near this case. He introduced and voted on the resolution of censure directly involving this case. But that might be a little to deep for Princeton's dumbest affirmative action student to comprehend.

5. MUCH of the public session was indeed spent on this lawsuit including all of Spodak's boring spewing.


6. You must think that just because you pretend to be a lot of different people, other people do the same thing. MANY of the residents of Manalapan are fed up with this lawsuit and have been posting. You're simply clueless as to that fact along with so many other facts. I never claimed to have any influence. I'm just a concerned resident who never got involved with you low lifes and have no intention of being involved in Manalapan politics while it remains in the hands of lying crooks like you. Roth won the election by a handful (remember she was beaten the first time by Locricchio by 2400 votes) because McEnery made sure no republican ran any kind of campaign against her. In other words, the election was fixed. Don't be so proud of the result. She should have won by at least 2,000 votes under those circumstances.

The rest of your statement is just as silly as you are. He's no more balding than you, Andrew, or McEnery, or Ward or virtually any other politician in Manalapan. So why are you so obsessed with that? Is it because everybody keeps pointing out you're gay and you need to deflect? And where do you get the idea he's out of shape? Compare him to Roth or Klauber or Ward or McEnery or, again, just about anybody else in Manalapan politics. The funny thing is, every time you attack him with something that doesn't make sense, all you're doing is proving you don't really have any way to attack him. Get a job, Andrew, you won't be so depressed.

Anonymous said...

ZING!!!!!!!!!! Couldn't have said it better myself!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

I have to laugh. Andrew is obsessed with this guy's hair. He's obsessed with this guy's body. He's obsessed with this guy's age. And then he expects us all to believe he's not gay? Ok. Sure.

Anonymous said...

Regarding the 3 posts above mine. I see you have been at it all day today, you clown. New name for you - Fawning Acolyte. Don't you work? You're becoming more pathetic with each post. Talk about obsession. You are a sick dude. It's all going to come out though. Just like you have been saying.

Anonymous said...

I could do without all of the namecalling here, but I believe each of you have points that are valid. Everything I have read about this lawsuit makes it more rediculous as it goes on. Too much money has already been spent. I think those who started this better pray that Manalapan wins it, because if the judge throws it out or says Moskowitz wasn't liable, then the longer this thing drags on, the more I'd sue for in a retaliation lawsuit if I were him.

Anonymous said...

to the post two above this one. Isn't acolyte a big word for a farmer? Oh, by the way. Transference. Transference. Transference.

Anonymous said...

and now we know who you are.

Anonymous said...

Nah, you don't. But you were never afraid of looking like a fool by claiming to know something you didn't before, so why stop now?

Anonymous said...

Yea, we do and you will be looking like the fool soon enough. Get the last word in geek, go ahead. It' doesn't matter anymore.

Anonymous said...

You're right, it doesn't matter any more. Lucas and McEnery are both toast. But I'll bet you have to respond -- even though you're criticizing other people for "having to get the last word in." Just like a "Queen"

Anonymous said...

Hey McEnery, if you like to post so much, why don't you make yourself useful and tell us about the DUI you got two months ago that you've been keeping a secret. And why don't you tell us how your son-in-law in Englishtown came close to being fired for violating rules. Wouldn't that be better than making things up all the time?

Anonymous said...

Michelle Roth you showed us all what a piece of garbage you are last night attacking Tomy Gennaro.

Anonymous said...

The old, balding and out of shape fat one was booted out as Township Attorney of Englishtown by a vote of three to two. Let us now see what spin will be put on this. Let us now see who's fault it is this time. Surely not poor Stu. He is the victim once again. Maybe he is going to sue Englishtown.

Anonymous said...

Yeah he's out so what. What does that have to do the way Roth acted last night against Gennaro nothing. Why hasn't it run on channel 77 yet? Hidding her very bad behavior? Deflect the facts all you want she is a miserable woman.

Anonymous said...

McEnery - first, why are you calling anyone bald and out of shape, especially when you're talking about someone who, unlike you, is neither bald, fat nor out of shape. Talk about transference!!!!. And how could he be booted out when they don't vote for attorney until January you moron? Let me guess, McGinnis learned that Stu didn't want to work for 130.00 an hour any more and after three years, they agreed to part. By the way, three years is an eternity for a municipal attorney. Manalapan replaces its township attorney each year. And how could the vote be 3-2 when there are seven votes on the Borough Council. No wonder you've never won a municipal election. You can't even count right when you're making things up to at least make it SEEM like you're telling the truth. Have another drink McEnery. By the way, you still haven't told us about your DUI.

Anonymous said...

McEnery - first, why are you calling anyone bald and out of shape, especially when you're talking about someone who, unlike you, is neither bald, fat nor out of shape. Talk about transference!!!!. And how could he be booted out when they don't vote for attorney until January you moron? Let me guess, McGinnis learned that Stu didn't want to work for 130.00 an hour any more and after three years, they agreed to part. By the way, three years is an eternity for a municipal attorney. Manalapan replaces its township attorney each year. And how could the vote be 3-2 when there are seven votes on the Borough Council. No wonder you've never won a municipal election. You can't even count right when you're making things up to at least make it SEEM like you're telling the truth. Have another drink McEnery. By the way, you still haven't told us about your DUI.

Anonymous said...

I didn't attend the meeting. What did Roth do to Gennaro this time?

Anonymous said...

She looked around and saw that he wasn't there, found out he wasn't going to be there because his father was dying in the hospital, and, vile coward that she is, took the opportunity to blast him and say ugly things about him. I don't think there is a lower form of life anywhere in Manalapan than this racist evil piece of garbage who, only two weeks earlier, upon learning that Susan Cohen was going to be in the hospital herself, set up Spodak to join her in attacking Susan Cohen. She thinks that by attending synagogue, that she can just confess her sins and go on being a vicious troll. It doesn't work that way Michelle. Your day is coming. Your day is coming. Your day is coming. Very very soon.

Anonymous said...

I didn't even know Spodak WAS the Borough attorney.

Anonymous said...

I didn't even know Spodak was still alive. You mean that guy Michelle parades out every meeting to viciously attack everyone like her own personal pit dog is actually alive? Whodathunkit. Wow, that's what he looks like while he's still alive? How terribly sad for him.

Anonymous said...

Has anyone heard anything more about this lawsuit Spodak supposedly filed against everyone saying mean things about him that his girlfriend Kathy reported like it was 1. true and 2. a story worth printing? LOL. I didn't think so. Does this guy know what a fool he looks like on TV? Does he really think he has ANYONE'S respect? Every meeting the same thing. This person is bad, that person is bad, everyone is bad. I'm perfect. I brought the library, I built town hall (all by myself, I didn't even use a contractor). I planted all the grass seed on the front lawn and watered it every day. I bought all of Rose Ann's clothing for her. I named Manalapan. I invented the internet, even though I don't know how to push that button that starts a computer. Maybe he thinks if he bores everyone to death, everyone will move out of Manalapan and he can run for office again. That would be interesting, since he hasn't lifted a finger to do anything positive for Manalapan since being thrown out of office in 1983.

Anonymous said...

I would have to think it either was tossed out of court or was really never actually filed since if memory serves he filed it against the Truthsquad and the blog is still here. I doubt the Transcript would print anything about it unless the outcome favored Spodak. IMHO.

Anonymous said...

I wonder why McEnery isn't admitting about his DUI, or admitting about his son-in-law fixing the DUI violation of Peter Hall, or the other things he did that's caused Englishtown to tell him he needs to find another job in 90 days to avoid being fired.

Anonymous said...

Read all about it!!!

What does Spodak's son have in common with Drew Shapiro?

Anonymous said...

They both despise you, for good reason?

Anonymous said...

RacistPigApartheidist said...
She looked around and saw that he wasn't there, found out he wasn't going to be there because his father was dying in the hospital, and, vile coward that she is, took the opportunity to blast him and say ugly things about him.......

But you are not a vicious troll right? Everything you say is truthful, well, because you say so, right?

Look in the mirror if you want to see what a real vicious troll looks like!

Anonymous said...

Lets say that the fathers & sons will not be heading to da OST for a beer this holiday season. They'll be heading somewhere they are quite familiar with and they'll be wearing their best "SUITS".

Anonymous said...

Sure, they will, sure they will. As usual you will be wrong about this, which will make you what, 0 for your last several hundred lies?

Anonymous said...

Would George Spodak be Steve Spodak's father?

Anonymous said...

The funny part is, McEnery and Lucas actually think that their postings are clever, that people aren't laughing at them personally, as Manalapan's biggest losers, and that there is actually someone who cares what they post here.

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d66Zi4PyWdc&feature=related

Anonymous said...

only Spodak's kid would actually still own a lava lamp. But at least now we know why Spodak's kid sued him (and won a $10,000.00 judgment) -- it was because Spodak gave him that face and body.

Anonymous said...

You, of all people, should not be commenting on someones looks!

Anonymous said...

Oh shut up Spodak. You bore us enough at township committee meetings. Now you're ranting at people you don't even know about their looks. You were a crook when you were in office. You were a crook in your meat business. You haven't lifted a finger in 25 years to serve this township. You were useless when you were in office. Your son sued you because you're a piece of trash. You're a washed out useless bag of wind that bores half the township and has the rest of us rolling in the aisles while you make a fool of yourself each meeting. Both your former wives count you as their biggest mistake in life. You lied about your lawsuit and your girlfriend Kathy who's never worried about the truth in her life, printed your bs like it was real. You're an embarrassment George. You have no dignity left. Now go ahead, threaten to sue me. Like I'm worried. Knowing you, you'll accuse me of being at least a dozen different people before ever getting it right. So there's little chance you'd ever figure out who I am anyway. Let's face it. You're a criminal and a pinhead, George. You always will be.

Anonymous said...

I'm not Spodak
I recently found out who you are
I do know what you look like
You’re hideous
I won't be suing you

Anonymous said...

You are Spodak, you don't know who any of us are. You don't know what any of us look like. No one is as hideous looking as you. You won't be suing anyone because you can't. You never could. Kathy's article about your "lawsuit" in July was a lie. She conned her editors as she always does. With each issue, she destroys the credibility of the News Transcript just a little more.

Anonymous said...

We shall see, won't we?

Anonymous said...

i think we already have. This is December. That lawsuit, according to the intellectually challenged and integrity challenged Kathy B. was in July. No lawsuit goes six months without anything happening.

Anonymous said...

Hmm. Kathy must have lied to the Star Ledger then, by your warped reckoning.

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2008/08/manalapan_exmayor_sues_to_find.html

What is tuly amazing to me is that you have no problem flat out lying through your teeth. What a hateful, despicable person you are. What the people in this town say about you is very much the truth.

Anonymous said...

Yawwwwnnn. It's bad enough you bore us to tears on Channel 77. Now you're boring us online, too. How's your son, George? I'll bet he's enjoying that $10,000 he got from you in that judgment, isn't he? Wow, what a loser you are. You even tried to rip off your son. Just like Drew tried to rip off his father. No wonder you too guys are best buds.

Anonymous said...

Stick to the topic clown. You said Kathy lied to the NT about the lawsuit. Why did every other news agency write about it? You're a LIAR. A lousy, good for nothing liar. No one brooks a LIAR. Say it. it fits you. LIAR.........

Anonymous said...

I have to agree. Nothing you can say has any credibility, because you are a LIAR!

Anonymous said...

Yawwwnnn. Why don't you discuss something we actually have some interest. Instead of wasting our time with that lawsuit that was withdrawn immediately after you filed it, why not tell us about the lawsuit your son won $10,000 against you in. Why not tell us about the domestic violence issues with your former wives. At least THAT would be interesting - a lot more interesting than hearing you whine about what you claim to have accomplished twenty six years ago when you actually had half a life, or attacking people who ARE doing something for the township and who DO have a life, and whose shoes you couldn't shine on your best day, you corrupt criminal.

Anonymous said...

Can we just stick to the fact that you are a LIAR? You are a LIAR. Why should we listen to anything else you have to say. You are a low life LIAR, who has been Lying here, there and everywhere for the last year. You have zero credibility. Who can take you seriously? Not even your family, I'm told. Go away, LIAR.

Anonymous said...

Someone told me he is an ugly looking liar. A big rimmed glasses, soon to be a double chined, ugly looking liar. Thanks for pointing this out for us. We residents have to stick together and not allow these rotten, wannabee politicians to get the better of us

Anonymous said...

When you yawn, does your master, you know, make a deposit?

Anonymous said...

I heard the kneeling is just the very tip of the iceberg, so to speak.

Anonymous said...

I heard the kneeling is just the very tip of the iceberg, so to speak.

Anonymous said...

wow, george. You're really starting to crack, you know? Now you're even talking to yourself online. Meanwhile, I just had a bunch of people over my house to watch you on channel 77. They're not from Manalapan but they think I was kidding when I said you really were a mayor of Manalapan twenty five years ago. They laughed and said, "Oh, that explains it." LOL. I also showed them copies of the court papers for your son's $10,000 judgment against you and your wife's charges against you for beating her.

Anonymous said...

You expect anyone to believe you LIAR? You can’t be serious. What about the allegation that I heard this week. You beat your kids for saying the name of a former township official? I can’t, actually, I can believe that from you. Try beating me and see what happens, sick one. You are morally bankrupt and you do kneel at the feet of your master. Hey wait, maybe you are the, ah, never mind. You are way to stupid!

Anonymous said...

George, George, George. Do you really think that calling someone a liar is going to completely wipe out your court records?

Anonymous said...

You don't get it, do you. You were called a liar because you were caught LYING:

“Kathy's article about your "lawsuit" in July was a lie. She conned her editors as she always does. With each issue, she destroys the credibility of the News Transcript just a little more.”

Get it? No, you probably don't get it. Habitual LIARS never do. Here's the thing about liars. No one believes anything they say, which by the way, is just about everything that comes out of your foul mouth. You can try to deflect attention from the fact that you are a LIAR all you want, but that won't change the fact that you are a LIAR. I think that pretty much covers it, don't you, you no good, good for nothing LIAR? Hey do you lie to your boss too? Oh, wait, you don't have a boss. You just sit around on your rotund, lying you know what all day and LIE! I’m done with you for the day creepy one, but go ahead and LIE some more if it amuses you. Carry on LIAR.

Anonymous said...

George, George, George. Do you really think that calling someone a liar is going to completely wipe out your court records?

Anonymous said...

Liar, Liar, Liar. Do you really think that saying the same inane thing over and over will wipe out the fact that you are dishonest, a lair, if you will? You have been outed LIAR. Now go serve the master.

Anonymous said...

George, George, George. Do you really think that calling someone a liar is going to completely wipe out your court records?

Anonymous said...

Hey George. How's that blood pressure coming? Wait until you see what it reads after the NEXT meeting. We'll be waiting for you George. Ain't nobody gonna stop us now. :)

Anonymous said...

You can't make up your mind, huh? Andy, Steve or George. Andy, Steve or George? Well, you're wrong on all accounts, you no good, good for nothing LIAR. Let's hear another LIE. They roll out of your mouth quite easily. Kind of reminds one of someone in particular.......

Anonymous said...

Hey George. How's that blood pressure coming? Wait until you see what it reads after the NEXT meeting. We'll be waiting for you George. Ain't nobody gonna stop us now. :)

Anonymous said...

You can't make up your mind, huh? Andy, Steve or George. Andy, Steve or George? Well, you're wrong on all accounts, you no good, good for nothing LIAR. Let's hear another LIE. They roll out of your mouth quite easily. Kind of reminds one of someone in particular.......

Anonymous said...

Hey George. How's that blood pressure coming? Wait until you see what it reads after the NEXT meeting. We'll be waiting for you George. Ain't nobody gonna stop us now. :)
(I thought I'd bring back memories. This is what Sylvia used to do to you until you beat her.)

Anonymous said...

How's that lawsuit coming, George? LOL. You're such a joke. At least you're not a total waste. Every two weeks we all get to have a hearty belly laugh watching you on channel 77. You are by far the funniest man in Manalapan. Every week it's "Look what I did, look what I did" and "He's a bad person, she's a bad person, everybody is evil but me, I'm the savior." LOL. Like we don't remember what a disaster you were. But the funniest part is your taking credit for all the things that didn't even happen until you left office.

Anonymous said...

Hmm. Kathy must have lied to the Star Ledger then, by your warped reckoning.

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2008/08/manalapan_exmayor_sues_to_find.html

What is tuly amazing to me is that you have no problem flat out lying through your teeth. What a hateful, despicable person you are. What the people in this town say about you is very much the truth.

Anonymous said...

Nice try, George. But you forgot to mention that the lawsuit was thrown out, just like Sylvia did to you.

Anonymous said...

Hey George. How's that blood pressure coming? Wait until you see what it reads after the NEXT meeting. We'll be waiting for you George. Ain't nobody gonna stop us now. :)
We're everywhere. We're everywhere. We know where you were and we know what you did.

Anonymous said...

Excellent. Make sure you introduce yourself, I particulalry want to meet you.

Anonymous said...

learn how to spell "particularly" first. You spell like you sold meat.

Anonymous said...

Ah, but I have never sold meat. Won't you be surprised. In fact, I'm positive you are going to be
particularly surprised. Just remember, you did say you will be waiting.

Anonymous said...

Actually, a lot of people who bought what you peddled as "meat" will agree with you that you never sold what the USDA would classify as "meat."

Anonymous said...

I'm, coming. Are you ready? I don't think you are, but we will see, no? Focused, like a laser beam, as the saying goes.

Anonymous said...

That's funny. Please say hello for me.

Anonymous said...

Hic. Burp.

Anonymous said...

Just thought you should be informed, George Spodak's son, Steve, passed away a few days ago and was buried today, Sunday, June 28, 2009, in Manalapan, NJ. Perhaps you can all put your differences aside and offer sympathy to the family. May he rest in peace.